Stripping metadata is up to the website / app, not the OS. Many apps use metadata, some don’t. If they don’t need the metadata and decide to do the right thing, then they’ll strip it.
Also upload my Android photos to Ente Photos and the metadata is preserved (thankfully).
The teacher didn’t forget
I was interested in the source for 38 here:
Using mild soap on well-seasoned cast-iron cookware will not damage the seasoning.[37] This is not because modern soaps are gentler than older soaps.[38]
It was just an article that said
Many sources explain that soap is OK because today’s dish soap (like our favorite from Mrs. Meyer’s) is gentler than it used to be. That may be true, but it’s not really the point. Once your pan is well seasoned, a little dish soap isn’t going to make a difference.
Pretty sad excuse for a source. Not even sure what that’s supposed to mean. Why is that not the point?
AFAIK the issue was soap used to contain lye which would destroy the seasoning. That’s a huge difference from modern soap.
Hmm, I never heard this misconception before, so for me it was pretty unsurprising. Cooking meat at extremely hot temperatures causes it to lose moisture.
Because I want to read it?
Edit: oh, oh I see.
What’s the name of the story?
It’s insane to me that people actually have plastic kettles.
Isn’t Signal E2E encrypted? How would it be able to decrypt them?
But then what’s the benefit to Signal? Just that it’s decentralized?
https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/nll/?p=20639
tl;dr it isn’t Latin Latin - a lot of swords had tons of odd spellings and there are theories about why that is. This sword could be a combo of acronyms of Latin words and possibly spelling errors.
For example, “I’d like a sword named Christmas” -> “Please make me a sword that says XMAS” -> sword that says XMS
Big creators make a ton of money from their videos. I’m fine with the Fediverse adding ads, or creators doing sponsorships. We need a separation of concerns. Fediverse is removing centralized corporate control.
We need a way to get good content creators money on the Fediverse.
IMO a very small amount of storage should be free but after that the user needs to pay. It’s the right thing to do for hosts and for the environment. If content creators need massive amounts of video then that will incentivize them to make money on it.
The only people left out are small, niche channels that have quality or important content but don’t make much money. Maybe they could be cut special deals by the hosts / donors.
But then how do you make money with a browser if you aren’t getting Google money and don’t spy on users?
Doesn’t Fediverse mean “these applications can federate with each other”? How would you federate with Lemmy without ActivityPub?
If there are multiple protocols, then that defeats the entire purpose of a protocol. If Matrix and ActivityPub are in the Fediverse, then Facebook and Twitter should be, too.
Facebook can’t talk with Twitter, so they aren’t federated with each other. Same goes for ActivityPub and Matrix. Fediverse doesn’t mean “has a federated protocol”. It means “these applications are federated with each other” (from what I understand).
The Fediverse uses the ActivityPub protocol. This allows everything in it to communicate with each other. Lemmy can’t communicate with Matrix since Matrix is a different protocol.
Did someone just slap this together by copying and pasting an asterisk three times? I know we’re an open source, nerdy community but could we hire a graphic designer?
AFAIK that would mean ChatGPT and each website (not Firefox) would decide that itself. Firefox doesn’t do it since a website may need it.
It wouldn’t need to be proprietary. The logic could just be “remove everything”. Not sure how the Google Inc thing appeared.