There is no practical alternative to this

An alternative would be to stop trying to overthrow some classes and touch grass

Soviet Union bureaucracy was not the proletariat, they didn’t use the mop to produce commodities, so they didn’t have proletarian class consciousness. Whatever interests they had, it was not working class interests. Lenin, Trotsky and Sverdlov were one nobleman and two petty bourgeoisie.

The State is the only path to a stateless society

This is demonstrably false as first there were stateless societies and then states appeared. If anything, stateless society is a path to the State.

“More fairly” means “more in a way that the said government sees fit”

Moe is bourgeois.

Since most of the machines I need to backup are VMs, I do it by the means of hypervisor. I’d use borg scheduled in crontab for physical ones.

Depends on the definition

Why did you drop them?

Like, did you meet a person who unironically blames satan for everything bad that’s happening to them?

Rule of law is about having a culture of respect for law as a legitimate product of democratic institutions

Law is a product of the government beating the shit out of people who break its rules. Since there’s no world government, international law doesn’t really exist.

What type of anarchism?

Socialism is the complete opposite of that. Socialism destroys horizontal connections and institution of family.

Maybe that’s why Lisa is spreading socialist propaganda. Bc her family directly benefits from it

What’s so bad about the laundry if you have a washing machine?

I’d say it’s post irony

Unfortunately, socialism discourages and eventually kills off broism.

Well, if it can’t be monetized, then you probably suck at whatever you’re doing, so it’s not that big of a loss. Hope that makes you feel better.

Is international law important or not?

The next election is the mechanism that makes them fulfill the promises they’ve made during their campaign

Why are you saying this? Who’s the target audience of this bs? What makes you say that if it’s demonstrably false? Elected politicians don’t keep their promises, they just don’t.

If your politicians aren’t afraid of losing the next election

Is Trump scared to loose the next election?

what is wrong with me hiring someone to hire more people?

It’s perfectly fine, but unrelated to the question at hand. You don’t hire politicians.

What is your counterargument other than “no”?

“No” is actually a stronger argument than yours bc you’re making a positive statement here and the burden of proof is on you.

You can’t own people, you never did, what are you trying to ask here?

I dunno. I guess your initial analogy was shit that explained nothing. Don’t use analogies then.

You can simplify where you can, but as technology advances it gets more complex to manufacture

And according to you, socialism is necessary for further technological advances. Why? How come we managed to have technological advances without socialism for 99% of human history?

As for quality of life metrics, things like literacy rates and life expectancies, home ownership and mortality rates

So as I said, arbitrary bs socialists deem important.

The Catholic Church should not determine this as they do not base their beliefs in known material reality.

I understand that you have different gods. Catholics have Jesus and socialists have material reality. But that’s just your opinion, man.

I am fairly certain that you’re a troll, though, so I don’t see much point in continuing this.

Sorry for not accepting socialist dogmas unquestionably.