I think it usually means night-watchman capitalism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Night-watchman_state

Huh, the community edition is Apache 2 licensed. I had assumed it was proprietary freeware.

Just the rumor of it alone benefits HODLers, and Trump has HODLers who donated to his election campaign.

This post about China doesn’t disparage China, so it’s gotta be downvoted. Sorry, I don’t make the rules.

The year ain’t over, and I’d bet money that the shootings ain’t, either.

“The cause” 😂 This is the most unserious response I can imagine. I’m going to remember this one; it’s really impressive.

Please stop before you embarrass yourself further. This is r/neoliberal[1][2] levels of bourgeois boosterism. Next you’re going to clutch pearls over poor Brian Thompson’s tragic death.

Do you work for Warren Buffet’s PR team or do you do this work for free 😂

I’m not sure Waters is even a committed socialist. But then I doubt you have a coherent definition for tankie, so who knows what you mean.

Thought-terminating cliché checks out.

He “donated” over 55 billion dollars to what/whom, and to what ends? I don’t think you understand how modern-day robber-baron largess works.

• Adam Ruins Everything - Why Billionaire Philanthropy is Not So Selfless
• Billionaire Philanthropy Is a Scam

He didn’t say “Russia did nothing wrong,“ but that is what NATO stans often hear.

I don’t put much stock in “nice,” but I can think of a few good celebrities.

• The late Harry Bellafonte
• Wallace Shawn
• Susan Sarandon
• Jane Fonda
• The late Sinéad O’Connor
• Roger Waters

All states don’t have it, actually. None of the Eurozone states do, for instance, and the US didn’t until 1971.

You don’t seem to be engaging with the content I’ve posted, but here’s one by Gabriel Rockhill anyway: How The Left Should Analyze the Rise of a Multipolar World, China, Russia & BRICS

was never pervasive

Proof?

It was a private tech industry thing, occurring within the relevant special economic zones. The same NATOpedia entry you posted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/996_working_hour_system#Companies_involved

and the state cracked down on it years ago.

Proof?

Again, the same NATOpedia entry you posted.

That’s good to hear.

deleted by creator

Because the Chinese state has fiat monetary sovereignty, it doesn’t function in the capitalist mode. It has no need to make a profit because it has infinite money[1]. It doesn’t need to extract surplus value from workers, and it doesn’t even need to break even. The logic of capitalism doesn’t apply.

Ultras fear the scroll.

“996” was never legal, was never pervasive, and the state cracked down on it years ago.