Yeah, they are good. I’ve been reading them since around 2015-2016 iirc. I used to hang out on the same subs and ran into Corey’s original account fairly often.
hail yourself
Yeah, they are good. I’ve been reading them since around 2015-2016 iirc. I used to hang out on the same subs and ran into Corey’s original account fairly often.
deleted by creator
To me laws establishing private property rights in a capitalist framework are the NAP in actual practice, so I think we can agree to disagree.
True. But it is both liberalism and a con. The con is in branding it as something other than liberalism, which he was able to do by conflating positive and negative freedoms.
Rothbardian libertarianism (aka ancap) is liberalism. He’s been on the record about it being a con.
Traditionally the term means anarchist. The concept of an NAP (which amounts to the legalized protection of inequality) is liberal, not anarchist. Anarchism supports the physical protection of equality because inequality is hierarchy.
They aren’t advocating it per se, but they are anarchists commenting on anarchist issues.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator