A.K.A u/hucifer

  • 0 Posts
  • 35 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

help-circle

  • Mine’s the 2020 AMD model, does everything I need it to do and it’s still going strong. Build quality is great and I love the high quality 2160 x 1440 display. Overall, it’s been a far better experience that the Dell XPS I had previously, which started giving me issues after just a couple of years.

    I bought it when I was living in Asia, though. Now I’m in the US, I honestly don’t know what replacement I’d pick up if it died tomorrow.




  • Kabe@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAre you a 'tankie'
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Hang on, so you’re telling me you guys lump social liberals in with classical liberals and neoliberals? That’s definitely not common, but then I suppose if you’re a communist then it kinda makes sense.

    Also, while I wouldn’t call Sanders a socialist either, he is not a centrist by any standard measure. I presume you don’t consider anyone a leftist if they don’t advocate for collective ownership and a centrally planned economy?



  • Kabe@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAre you a 'tankie'
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    If you ask in earnest, you’ll get good responses. A good number of people ask questions not to learn a different point of view, but to reinforce their own existing biases, which naturally becomes exhausting.

    That is understandable, however I was more talking about good-faith attempts to express views that are contrary to ML orthodoxy being dogpiled, removed, and banned. I have personal direct experience with this, as do many others who have attempted to engage in political discussions in ML communities. Perhaps users of the ML persuasion are used to being attacked and this why contrarian views are so heavily moderated on ML instances, but quite often this defensive response only leads to alienating other leftists who could be sympathetic to your point of view.

    Also, I already understand quite well the differences between classical, social, and neo-liberalism, and how the term is used in the US; I have degree in political science. My point was that users on ML instances weaponize the term in the same way that other users utilize the term “tankie” in order to dismiss people who disagree with them, ad hominem.




  • Kabe@lemmy.worldtoAsklemmy@lemmy.mlAre you a 'tankie'
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    now it just means, “any leftist I don’t like”.

    With respect, there’s a bit more to it than that.

    The way political discussions are often policed on this server, Lemmygrad, and Hexbear is not conducive to welcoming new people to your point of view. If a, let’s say, social democrat says something critical of the CCP and then is immediately censured or even banned then they are going to depart with a very negative impression, which only feeds into the stereotypes about these instances and stifles healthy political discussion.

    Also, aren’t people on .ml, Lemmygrad, and Hexbear also guilty of the same thing when they use of the word “liberal” in a pejorative sense to denote “anyone left-of-centre who doesn’t support communist party rule”?

    It’s a shame that leftist infighting exists to such a degree we often share about 95% of the same views to an external observer.


  • True, but I would argue that American Chinese food is a distinct cuisine in its own right, just as Anglo-Indian is.

    If the argument is that the British Empire didn’t incorporate seasonings and spices into its own traditional cuisine, then I’d argue that none of the European powers did. French cuisine is still undeniably French and spice-less, despite their colonialist history in Africa and the Caribbean.