The US is a successful country and has almost always been at war.

Britain at its peak was holding 10s of countries at gunpoint.

Violence works best if you are much much stronger than the other party.

Better off posting this on the dbzero instance

What has the current administration actually stopped Israel from doing? Every line in the sand has been crossed and there have been no consequences, trump won’t be worse for Palestine than Kamala

It depends on how that country is formed, and what happens to Jerusalem.

If Israel withdraws from west bank and Gaza, and truly allows them to be a sovereign state(s), with their own navy, air force, ground force, then the US would step in via the UAE. I would also guess that they will get lots of money coming in from other Arab governments because they all want influence in Palestine, in addition to money from Arabs as people.

In terms of government, if elections are held I assume Hamas would win (in Gaza and wb). In which case countries like Egypt will start being less friendly towards Hamas than they are right now, because they can be seen as a viable government. The reason Egyptian government would dislike Hamas is because they are a spin-off of the brotherhood, which the sisi couped in order to gain power. Generally, Egyptian government is very afraid of the brotherhood and will root them out wherever possible because they are often the only party (other than police and military) that may be in a position to rule the country.

In terms of long term economy and how the government would function I have no idea. Hamas controls an area the size of a small town, and the Palestinian authority has no real autonomy, its not even allowed to collect taxes. My guess tho is that it will resemble south Africa in terms of infrastructure (garbage).

I don’t think it will collapse like Libya and be run by criminals, but it won’t be as prosperous and safe as many of the Gulf countries.

Basically I’m talking out of my ass, there’s really no way to know

Being the first to do x, first man on the moon for example. Or be the 28th president

Wdym?

Yes but I’m not going to buy a house for 6 months just to sell it, it’s not very feasible.

I’m staying in a city temporarily for about 6 months, whers would I live if I couldn’t rent?

Not sure if it counts but the devonian extinction is probably my favorite. Wiped out a bunch of marine vertebrates (I hate fish, they had it coming)

The theories behind why it happened changed, and it’s technically two small extinction events. Although it is pretty big iirc >95% of the worlds vertebrates died off and did not come back

Simpler to say is

Raqam ghalat

That’s what I say, you could throw in a sorry at the end

Trump started off coherent, but ~30% in he went of the rails.

Kamala on the other hand looks like she has no strong values, she doesn’t seem like a Dem candidate. What kind of Dem candidate is pro fracking? Kamala honestly seems disingenuous.

Trump on the other hand didn’t form more than 20 complete sentences, so I can’t really call him disingenuous because he doesn’t seem to stand for anything

Maybe a junkyard?

Watr in Ukraine is proxy war

The reality is that NATO and the United States, are now, without question, in a proxy war with Russia," former CIA director and US defense secretary Leon Panetta told the ABC.

"Maybe it’s not a direct war, but it certainly is a proxy war, in terms of their efforts to make Putin pay a price.

That is their stated goal, but their actions show otherwise.

They mostly fight other Sunni Muslim organizations like Taliban, Hamas, Al Qaeda, which does not help in their stated goal.

They claim to follow the teachings of an author called Sayed Qutb, who is a really big figure in the Muslim brotherhood (which Hamas comes from) yet they attack Hamas.

Also

IS ideologues rarely uphold adherence to Islamic scholarship and law manuals for reference, mostly preferring to derive rulings based on self-interpretation of the Qur’an and Muslim traditions

Compare ISIS with the Taliban, an actual fascist organization which wants to rule in such a manner. Taliban mainly operated in Afghanistan, against invaders be they Russians, NATO, whatever. They did not operate in foreign countries like ISIS does. ISIS openly admits that it wants to destabilize other countries and radicalize Muslims living abroad to convince them to commit acts of terror

ISIS wants to stir religious hatred in Europe and the United States – so that Muslims no longer feel they belong in the West, and either carry out attacks in their homelands or leave to join the caliphate.

If they genuinely wanted to establish a caliphate they would first focus on gaining regional dominance, then either freeing Al quds, and occupying mecca.

Instead they fight Hamas, and try to get Muslims to commit acts of terror abroad

I think there may be physical buttons for those fans

Declare them to be non terrorists, problem solved

Where no bell piece prize

ISIS aren’t fascist, they don’t have a desire to rule, they just want to fight and kill. They’re wardogs

That alone won’t, but if someone irl suspects they know who you are your silhouette can be used to verify/confirm.

No, they don’t rely on the BitTorrent network, it’s just regular video streaming

Nobody is saying that.

The person I’m replying to says that the way she phrases things has subtext that she should avoid, I’m saying that she is in primary school so fuck it