I assumed people don’t trust Meta compared to Bluesky.
I assumed people don’t trust Meta compared to Bluesky.
No, Fedora makes their own (though they also include GNOME defaults at least in Workstation)
I know this is a side topic, but is it just me or Fedora linux used to have stunning default wallpapers but they are gradually getting worse?
Arch linux but once I have the opportunity, I will probably switch to Fedora again. Benefits of Arch isn’t that worth it for me
Sorry I saw it earlier but I forgot to respond. Named workspaces are always active, and they stay in place regardless if there is a window there or not.
I feel like you are missing something because I can directly hop around one of my ten workspaces with a single click, without a need of scrolling through the workspaces between. What I do is to create ten named workspaces in startup (I actually only use like five of them but let’s ignore that). Then I can still navigate them by the index number. I don’t use regular workspaces enitrely in my setup.
Note: I only use a single monitor and never move workspaces up or down so I don’t know the experience there.
Also, the fact that you can edit COSMIC through config files is a game changer. Although I don’t really like the tiling layout style, sometimes I want something easy to setup like GNOME but with good autotiling
Niri has a way to have named workspaces now which basically act like persistent workspaces, so you don’t have to use dynamic workspaces system. I really like niri and have it as my daily driver
YES