snooggums

That could also be done by having improved techniques to quickly dispatch the rats without needing to also scale up the character’s toughness so their bites are less effective.

It is still a bit buggy but far, far more stable than it was when it launched. I haven’t crashed in months.

Yeah, I play with 3 friends and we chose to go into the update blind without watching the promos or the warbond first. It was a blast figuring out what worked and didn’t from scratch before checking out online discussion and seeing if we missed anything aince there are a ton of options!.

Isn’t it funny that a lot of people were worried that wikipedia would be unreliable because anyone could edit it, then turned out pretty reliable, but AI is being pushed hard despite being even more unreliable than the worst speculation about wikipedia?

Being for profit excuses being shitty I guess.

Less than a year.

Yes on the toughness, which seems similar to the bile titan when its head didn’t take damage.

Also, the laser from the harverster seems to sometimes be instakill and other times just a lot of damage.

Still having fun, just some frustration.

Chlamydia cuddles!

“They didn’t learn to fight that overwhelming urge to mate I gave them. Better send an ever increasing number of STDs!”

As an American, we made a mistake in not adopting those. Torx or whatever isn’t even as good.

I’m all for people discussing anything they like. But if you’re just wondering how many ancient world wonders there are, maybe have a look at the Wikipedia article first.

El oh el

When asking about the Beatles, are they asking about those still living or all of the founding members? Sice many bands have changed members over time, could they be asking about the time in the band or their age in years?

Suse, this was easy for the Beatles since they had a single lineup and are popular enough that all of that is easy to find. But it is a good example of a simple question that could be asking different things based on context and even if they get an answer it isn’t necessarily what they are looking for, but they didn’t know how to ask. Follow up questions are possible when interacting with others who may point out missing context, but not for search engines.

Also, kind of funny that you are an instance with ‘discuss’ in the name and you are opposed to discussion about easy to search things.

Maybe they read the documentation and the documentation doesn’t clearly answer their question.

You can always just ignore their question if you don’t want to answer. Let someone else do it.

For the last decade, the vast majority of helpful results for obscure things has been reddit posts of users asking the exact same question. Usually the person answering knows some context that the person asking isn’t aware of needing to include in their question, which is why they couldn’t find it on their own. Heck, a lot of the time I was missing the same piece of information!

Without someone answering the ‘easy’ question, there wouldn’t have been any results that were clear answers to those questions.

I haven’t noticed any of it in my feed before that - so I guess they don’t push it on users and it’s optional somewhere out of the way

That’s a bold assumption.

My absolute favorite videos for car repairs were some shade tree mechanics who just recorded what they were doing and talking through the steps. No fancy lighting setups, no separate camera person. Just explaining and sharing knowledge for something that I couldn’t figure out by reading words because the written word was just ‘lightly hammer’ and they showed the angles and explained where the parts were frequently getting caught.

You are a hero.

This. Searching Google still nets valid first page results most of the time.

How was the ten year sleep you apparently just woke up from?

Doing the lord’s work.

“Just make shit up” is basically saying the same thing.

Go duck yourself!