• DraughtGlobe@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    The waste doesn’t pose any danger as long as it’s stored securely and doesn’t cost that much space. The only downside of the waste is that it needs to be stored forever, but that’s a very, very, small price to pay for not destroying the planet…

    • Sniatch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      But its also possible without nuclear waste. You are just pushing the problems with the waste to the future generations.

        • Sniatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          Agreed, the future generations already have enough problems. Thats why we should invest into stuff that brings solutions and does not create problems.

            • Sniatch@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              6
              ·
              8 months ago

              No, money is the problem. If nuclear wasnt that expensive then sure, go for it.

              • atro_city@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Money a problem? We have individuals with more money than entire cities and companies with more money than entire nations. Money is not the problem.

                • Sniatch@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yes because nuclear plants are so expensive which means electricity price will go up for the non rich people. Unless of course they use tax money to bring down the cost but that means you still paying with your taxes to make it more affordable.

        • Sniatch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Well renewables are better for future generations. Maye you shuld push for that instead of an overly expensive water boiling maschine

      • Star@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nuclear fuel came from the ground, it can go back in the ground. Future generations aren’t going to be impacted by nuclear waste storage.

      • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        What problem? If they’re stupid enough to dig it back up, they get what’s coming to em