• Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Too bad most commenting haven’t read the interview (what else is new, eh?). I like this, Jack Dorsey responding to a question on how the US government had its hooks into Twitter’s leadership before the buyout:

      I think it was problematic, and I also don’t think the people who got called out in the Twitter Files get enough credit for pushing back on government requests. The U.S. is certainly one of them. Twitter has a track record of fighting the U.S. on free speech causes, especially around transparency reports. Opening the lens even broader to other governments, we had even more fights. Tons of fights with India, Turkey, Russia, Nigeria. These are all governments that threatened arrest of our employees, raided our employees’ homes, offices, asking for phone numbers and personal information for accounts that were critical of the governments. I think that was one part that’s overlooked and not appreciated.

      • davel@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Two things can be true at the same time: that Twitter & Nostr have become Nazi bars and that the large US corporate social media platforms (Meta, X, Alphabet, Reddit, etc.) have become constituent parts of the US military-intelligence-industrial complex.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Because — in Dorsey’s telling, at least — Bluesky was “literally repeating all the mistakes [Twitter] made as a company.”

    That’s the TLDR from an interview Dorsey conducted with journalist Mike Solana at his Pirate Wires site.

    And then Dorsey decided what he really wanted to do was help Nostr, another Twitter alternative, which promises to actually be an open-source protocol, instead.

    Dorsey, for instance, has some mostly kind words about Elon Musk, who bought Twitter in 2022.

    Though that mostly repeats his idea that Twitter’s original sin was becoming a venture-backed, for-profit company that went public with a business model based on advertising, positioned as a Facebook competitor.

    But that story/argument isn’t a new one — you can find it in this four-episode podcast series I hosted last year, for instance.


    The original article contains 349 words, the summary contains 132 words. Saved 62%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      He was on the board, it’s not like it was his project or anything. Imo he wanted to create a protocol, not a platform. “Improve Activitypub” like they always claimed. But then Bluesky realized that they can simply build their own platform and be Twitter 2.0

      • heluecht@pirati.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        @Microw @dumbass No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

          • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Moderation should always be client side. Server side should not be able to interfere or even read public content

            Yup. I don’t know if I agree re public content, but perhaps private messages should be encrypted, client side, before sending? That issue is one that bothers me about Mastodon.

        • Old_Geezer@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          No. He wouldn’t be happy with ActivityPub as well. He imagines a social network where no one can perform any moderation. He favours Nostr for exactly that reason. Bluesky has got moderation (just like the Fediverse) - which he dislikes.

          So? Like Usenet was back in the day before it became a pirate haven. Then email lists became it. LOL, People tend to ignore the extreme nut jobs regardless. I never saw any child porn on Usenet, but then I didn’t go looking for it. No doubt it existed too.

        • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          Its community based so his opinion could be ignored, unlike when he’s on a board and his opinion was ignored.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      it’s meant to be twitter by ui and feel, for sure.

      i’d also say it’s meant to be more like twitter from a decade ago when twitter actually had a functioning moderation system and kept toxicity away. the moderation system, which is open sourced and allows anyone to add on to, is one of the best.

      i’m subscribed to https://bsky.app/profile/aegis.blue, which blocks or hides antisemites, bigots, racists, transphobes, you name it.

  • TomMasz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’m on Bluesky and my view of it, at least, is absolutely nothing like Twitter. I’m glad he quit it before he could really turn it into another Nazi-infested hellhole.

  • bquintb@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Man…no leadership, no accountability, just a rich billionaire drifter acting like he has principles. Idgaf, I like fediverse, and I like my block button…it’s the only alt I’ve found that isn’t a rightwing cess pool full of degens.

  • psvrh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    He really doesn’t understand people, does he?

    He’s like the libertarian techbro equivalent of a Stalinist tankie.

    • Ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      It doesn’t block them though does it? My understanding is that it simply filters them so that you don’t see them anymore. They’re still there doing their thing though.

      • Jennykichu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You’re correct. It doesn’t stop Nazis from having a home or building a following. It just allows users to not see it.

      • damon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        It does block them more so than on fedi. When I block someone they can’t see my content nor account, they can’t log out and go see my content. It’s not just filtered, also they have banned accounts and removed content