• Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I remember people on reddit misgendering that antiwork mod for the crime of [checks notes] a botched interview on Fox News that didn’t even fucking matter.

    It was an ugly thing to see all that transphobia out in the open like that.

    • li10@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      That was a colossal fuck up of an interview though, made the entire anti work community look like a load of stupid freeloaders.

      Absolutely no excuse for the misgendering or any harassment, but I still wouldn’t undersell how bad that interview was.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        It was Fox News. Even if had been a stellar interview, they would have made it look bad.

        And I don’t think it had any actual impact on how people viewed the community in general. It’s just people being terminally online and blowing things way out of proportion.

        I agree the interview was bad, but it’s also one of the most inconsequential parts about it. That’s the tiniest most petty reason I’ve ever seen a community tear itself apart over. It was like a bunch of mindless chickens pecking one to death because they saw a spot of blood. Definitely on brand for reddit though.

        • grte@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It was a Fox News interview. If the person who did the interview came off well they wouldn’t have bothered airing it. Hell, if the person they interviewed didn’t come off the way they did they wouldn’t have bothered interviewing them.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            I mean I agree Fox News will pick apart anything that they get, that’s just the nature of the beast. But the whole discussion in the antiwork community was that whoever did the interview needed to be prepared for that and give them as little ammunition as possible, while presenting the beliefs of the antiwork/workreform movement.

            Instead, one of the users (a mod I think?) took the interview without further input from the community, had dirty clothes in the background, and was an easy target for the Fox News crowd.

            Idk, it was really unfortunate, and the movement had started to gain serious momentum. It could’ve been a lightning in a bottle opportunity, and they fucked it up

            • grte@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              This is what I’m getting at, though. If the interviewee didn’t fit the checklist of stereotypes Fox News was looking for, there wouldn’t have been an interview aired. It was a hit piece. Fox News went looking for a way to run a segment discrediting a movement, and found one.

        • Grayox@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          It really is hard to understate how bad the interview was, that’s what makes the misgendering even worse, there were so many other things to critique…

    • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You think that interview didn’t matter? It basically killed the entire conversation about wage/labor imbalance. And that had zero to do with that mods gender, but with that mods absolute stupidity, regardless of gender

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        This is so melodramatic lol

        It “killed” nothing. That was one bad mod vs. a bunch of users who were determined to self destruct.

  • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I disagree for one reason.

    My uncle was being homophobic and transphobic so I started to misgender him so he could see what its like.

    Unsure if he’s less bigoted now but he definitely got quite upset and it made the point to everyone else around at least.

    • doingless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I try to speak respectfully to whoever I speak to and that includes using pronouns they want so getting it wrong is always unintentional. But I’ll still always speak to any group of people as “you guys”. I use that speaking to my 16 yo daughter and her girl friends. It’s just not gendered speech, and I know some disagree but whatever

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    The purpose of language is to reveal and convey meaning and thought. Euphemisms and euphemistic language are designed to control how you talk about certain subjects and consequently, how you think about them. People who try to control how you think NEVER have anyone’s “best interests” in mind but their own.

    Don’t let other people tell you how to manage your own head.