• vexikron@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Duh, moron, the future is you just live in the car.

    You cant legally park it anywhere near anything useful for survival, and gas is expensive and so is car insurance.

    But thats fine because cars and car companies have more rights than people! Or something…

    What I am saying is anyone who walks to the grocery store /deserves/ to get run over.

    Natural Selection mannnnn!

    inhales

    Alright, feelin good, got beer in the glove compartment, time to film my magnum opus:

    DeathRace 2024.

    YEEEEEHAAAWWW!!!

    immediately peels out, doesnt see other driver blowing a red light until too late, swerves to avoid and crashes into the weed dispensary, paralyzing himself from the legs down and killing 4 others

    • GreyBeard@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      In many cities, people are literally living in cars that don’t run, in public parking spaces, because it’s the only enclosed place they can afford to live in.

      • vexikron@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yep, and that is almost always illegal, and such people almost always end up having the car towed, having to pay for the car being towed, losing all their possessions and then becoming homeless.

        Its just a matter of time until enough people report it and the police get around to it.

    • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because it’s not meant to compare countries, it’s meant to compare sizes. That interchange could be replaced with any interchange of similar size.

  • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This isn’t a great argument. There is so much open undeveloped space in the US that could be used to house people. This interchange isn’t taking space away from anyone. There are lots of good reasons to reduce cars, but this isn’t one of them.

    • thantik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Do you think the people here care about sound arguments? Nobody except for a select few hyper-fit nutjobs are ever going to walk even so much as an 1/8th of that images span for anything. The area is far too large to want to walk, so we use it for transit instead. Forget that it transports millions of people, products, goods, etc. They want it to house hundreds of people instead.

      People who will then not be able to get those products and goods, because…they fuckin’ ripped the road out!

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is it just me, or are the Lemmy fuck cars communities a lot more infested with trolls like this guy☝️ than the one on Reddit was?

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sound arguements are fine, but the interchange is literally in the middle of the 4th(?) largest city in the US, not the middle of nowhere. Houston is also known for a huge amount of sprawl which is literally caused by the amount of space the 10+ lane roads take up.

        • schmidtster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is America running out of space or something? Yeah it’s a concern when there is limited space, but America is mainly “empty” the sprawl doesn’t affect them.

          • Katlah@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            “Hm yes if we inefficiently use all this space then we can destroy all this perfectly good agricultural land and make space for more cars!”

            • schmidtster@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              What’s inefficient about vertical farming? There’s plenty of green area even in the Picture that’s posted, could easily put a bike and pedestrian network through there. If it was needed.

              There’s always solutions, but it’s also just easier to bitch and moan instead.

              • eatfudd@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                11 months ago

                What’s inefficient about vertical farming?

                Cost. It’s a lot more expensive to build vertical. Additionally you need lighting that would wouldn’t need otherwise.

                • schmidtster@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  The capacity more than makes up for it. You could also grow in cold climates where you can’t normally as well.

                  The benefits are there.

    • gregorum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s not really true here though. This is in the middle of an urban area, not in some big open empty space that’s unoccupied, like Montana, or North Dakota. This is in the middle of Houston, Texas, a very populous city.

      • schmidtster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And? If they need space they expand elsewhere. If this interchange was at the edge of town, middle of town, north or south. The town is still the same size. America is large, lots of “empty” space.

          • paaviloinen@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            …and even though it’s next to industrial zone, this is what downtown Houston actually looks like on a map. Numerous square miles of space just for “letting traffic through”. The bill on the upkeep of this kind of wasteful infrastructure must be much more than what it costs to provide housing for all the homeless people in the county!

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Calling anywhere in Greater Houston “the middle of an urban area” is just incorrect. It’s the 4th most populated city in the US and the 150th most densely populated. There are a lot of people in Houston but also just a fucking Tom of Houston around. But, as is the norm in this magazine, you are all free to ignore facts and data so you can raise a furor in your tiny anti-car cult.

        • Gabu@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Did you really decide that posting that was a good idea? Did you seriously think about it at all before writing it?

            • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              I concur bro. These bullshitters are high on their own farts and apparently can’t see the truth that they are never going to change the vast landscape of America into their imaginary Soviet-style shithole idea of a “utopia” where people don’t drive and live in tiny boxes in human hives.

        • Why do you think it’s so sparsely populated? What’s keeping people so far from each other? Is it just Houstonians are their own species and can’t stand to be in areas over a certain population density?

          • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            Because humans enjoy having lots of space to live in. Personally I would never go back to living in an apartment since I can afford a house and land. I’ve lived in small apartments, big apartments, a single-wide trailer, large houses, small houses, and medium houses. Medium house with acreage of land is the best living situation of all for me.

    • Anarch157a@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think OP’s argument is that the interchange is a symptom of low density urban sprawl and all the associated maladies that come with it.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        According to wikipedia, 8.4/10k for italy vs 17.5/10k for the US. So while the US is the richest country in the world they have twice as many homeless people per capita :/