Is there a reason why? Less funding? Web devs don’t make the pages Firefox friendly? Since the user base is smaller, they just don’t care?

  • Einar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Ah. You pray at the altar of Google with the mantra: “It only works in Chrome or Edge. Why not upgrade your browser?”

    What could possibly go wrong with giving all the power to one browser engine? If only there was a precedent to learn from…

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Bruh, he just explained what his company’s workflow is like. He wasn’t espousing the opinions that everybody is accusing him of, just saying how his job requires him to work.

      This community can be hyper-reactionary sometimes.

        • Chozo@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah I’m sure he, alone, is responsible for his company’s practices, and isn’t just a dude trying to make a paycheck.

          • ѕєχυαℓ ρσℓутσρє@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            I never said he alone did it. I’m sure he’ll be happy to share credit for any great product his company makes. Why not take some of the blame too? (I’m not sure if he does think that way though. He hasn’t replied since. I’m just replying to other people.)

            • Chozo@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              Why should he take the blame for something he likely has no influence over? That’s like blaming the Sandwich Artist because you don’t like Subway’s bread; he just makes the sandwiches, he doesn’t design the recipe.

              • Honestly, I’d be fine and understand that he cannot but be complicit in this due to powers beyond his reach. I’d eat my words if he says that he doesn’t like it, but has to comply. But he seems like he’s pretty happy with it. (Again, from that one comment.) I will blame the sandwich artist if he defends shitty sandwiches. Because one has to be responsible for their own work. They’re free to not give a fuck about what anyone thinks. But they are complicit.

                • NoiseColor@startrek.website
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  I’m happy to reply. I don’t think I’m complicit to anything else but an inconsequential business decision and I don’t care one way or the other about it. I used to use Firefox, but I stopped because some apps were broken on Firefox. I’m not a soldier for any browser im a pragmatic user.

    • NoiseColor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Haha, no. We don’t pray. We make web apps to make money. Catering to a negligible users who for some reason want to use the single browser with issues, that’s up to them.

      • loutr@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I use firefox exclusively, on both my laptop and my phone. It works perfectly on any website I throw at it. I work for a startup which makes video call apps, the web client works perfectly under Firefox, and there’s a grand total of 2 devs working on it.

        All this to say that if I come across your website and it doesn’t work under Firefox, AFAIC it’s your website that has issues, not Firefox.

        As for the reason, you might be fine with a single megacorp dictating the way the web works, but for many of us who remember what it was like in the IE hegemony days it’s a serious concern.

            • NoiseColor@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              I would, if there wasn’t for my personal experience of using Firefox, when I had to switch to other browsers for some websites I used.

              Its because of that, that when we decided to ignore Firefox, I wasn’t against it.

                  • When it’s the software that’s actually faulty. As others have mentioned, Firefox usually sticks to the standards. You’re just using some peculiarities of Chromium, which is why you might be having issues. Anyway, this actually seems irrelevant to your stance, since you care more about the market share. Which is fine, being profit driven and all. But then you shouldn’t get annoyed when people like me call you lazy.

          • kava@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            It’s a question of

            How much effort (man hours which ultimately translates to $$$) versus how much revenue lost (people not buying because of Firefox bugs)

            In my experience this depends on your specific application. Sometimes there are weird bugs or behavior where you have to really hunt down what’s going on. Other times it’s as simple as changing a few css lines or something.

            • NoiseColor@startrek.website
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              It’s almost impossible to calculate revenue lost, but as much as we tried, it was 0 or almost 0.

              Again, we don’t even check anymore.