• wellheh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    IMO the problem is not that you can’t block them but tooling. It is true that with the appropriate tools and work you can farm the data yourself and get everyone’s votes, but realistically most people aren’t going to go out of their way to do that. I see no reason why this would make lemmy better and instead just gives ammunition to bad actors. The poster above you is asking why we need to do more things to avoid bad actors as an effect of the change instead of avoiding that outcome. We know there will be bad actors, but we don’t need to make things easy for them. Maybe you were never gonna stop the guy willing to make an instance and look through all your votes, but you’d stop all the ones who wouldn’t be willing to put in the effort.

    • subignition@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can see the logic in that. I feel like the easier it is for someone to misbehave, the more quickly they’ll be weeded out from a community, but I agree that there might be an increase in the effort required by individual users because of something like this.

      • hightrix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The fact that downvoting is seen as possible misbehavior is enough for me to be extremely against public votes.