• J Lou@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    There can be investors in market-based postcapitalist society. They just can’t hold voting shares, so they hold non-voting preferred stock.

    Freedom to structure one’s own company as a worker coop doesn’t undo the systematic violations of workers’ inalienable rights in all the other capitalist firms. The only way to fix that would be turn those firms into worker coops as well

    • throwwyacc@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      See that isn’t very consistent is it? If you hold non voting stock you can’t vote on company decisions. But the company does now need to pay you a dividend, which according to you would be immoral as it would mean a third party is profiting from their labour correct?

      • J Lou@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        The problem isn’t the fact that the investors get some value. It is that the employer gets sole property right to the produced outputs and holds all the liabilities for the used-up inputs despite the workers’ joint de facto responsibility for using up the inputs to produce the outputs. This mismatch violates the tenet that legal and de facto responsibility should match. Worker don’t create output ex nihilo. They use up inputs. Dividends help satisfy those input liabilities @lemmyshitpost