• sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Government acted with impunity here. Will anyone get held accountable for this?

    Did Trump give them explicit permission to “lose” child or did somebody not do their job?

    • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was intentional, the goal was to permanently separate children from their families to deter immigrants and asylum seekers.

      This is a LONG article, but extremely detailed with tons of interviews and documents to back it up like emails and memos obtained via FOIA requests: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/09/trump-administration-family-separation-policy-immigration/670604/

      It’s also paywalled, but once archive.org comes back online you can find it there. I highly recommend reading the whole thing.

      The main takeaway is that the family separation policy was pushed by Trump and his administration incessantly. It took a while to really start because various government officials were reluctant to do it, and kept trying to placate the White House by slow walking the whole thing.

      At one point, government lawyers who process asylum claims realized that the separated children were being shipped away from the local holding facility without any documentation, effectively “losing” them in the system. The lawyers figured this was just a terrible error and began processing asylum claims by the parents faster. If they could get it done within a week or so, the children would still be held in the nearby facility and could be reunited with their parents.

      The white house was furious and directed the holding facility to start “relocating” the children faster, so that they’d be lost in the system before the parents could be processed.

      The cruelty is the point.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        So crime happened and looks it was documented properly?

        But perps will not be held accountable?

        • Eldritch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          It was in the course of executing his duty. John Roberts says you can’t prosecute him for that. And if he marches them into ovens this time you can’t prosecute him for that either. The dream of Nixon and Roger Ailes has finally come to fruition. As Nixon said…

          Well, when the president does it, that means that it is not illegal", by definition.

          The coup has already occurred. And everyone collectively yawned.