• Nyciferi@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 month ago

    The thing is - we shouldn’t have had to do that. Maybe alternatively, but not primarily.

    Microsoft’s problem with Windows 8, was how they got a hair up their ass by being obsessed with mobile technology. Tablets and Phones specifically. That they decided in their ‘infinite wisdom’, to infect desktops with a theme and performance that honestly was more suited for mobile devices.

    • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I’m honest, I can take them doing that to desktops. I hate it and think it’s stupid, but I can also see that in not the target audience and don’t like computer touch screens.

      What pisses me off the most is that they did it TO THE GODDAMNED SERVER VERSION TOO! There is no reason for 2012/r2 to have the tile interface other than both are built on the same architecture. Its so asinine to have a touchscreen interface on a server platform.

    • the_crotch@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      It was a stupid and unnecessary decision, yeah. That didn’t make it a bad OS though. It was a step up from windows 7 in almost every way other than a dumb aesthetic choice that people became hyper focused on.

      • DaGeek247@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        I still miss the windows 7 glass look. That was peak desktop layout. Everything you need, nothing you don’t.

        And then they threw all of that good design away for a relatively mid mobile showing.

        That didn’t make it a bad OS though

        Interface design is an incredibly important part of software development. The users weren’t wrong when they shunned windows 8, microsoft was wrong for shitting on 30 years of interface development.