• BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 month ago

    You only get a short time with the pointy end of the spear and then once a sword wielder is inside your range, you’ve got an unwieldy stick and they have a sword. Good for stand off melee maybe but prob not. Go swords.⚔️

    • Whorehoarder@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 month ago

      So you’re saying, once you lose your advantage you gain a disadvantage? This the kind of religious propaganda that put Atreides on the throne

      • BlazarNGC@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        I’m just saying you better be hot fire with that spear. Otherwise you’re getting cut.

        • dwindling7373@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Absolutely not. It’s the other way around there’s a reason any army get spears while swords are just a simbol for nobility.

            • dwindling7373@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 month ago

              I’m not an expert, are you? All the in dephts historical weapon stuff I met in my life has told me and confirmed me spears win against swords.

              • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 month ago

                I didn’t say spears didn’t win against swords.

                Spears are easier to wield, it’s a pointy stick. It requires less training to use. Requires significantly less materials to make.

                They are a standoff weapon though, in close combat a sword or small bladed weapon wins. Different tools for different purposes.

                The information I’m parroting is from experts and historians and literature and everything I’ve read over my 4 decades, it’s common knowledge at this point and not really worth “arguing” imo.

          • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I always find it fascinating the kind of things people will say because they saw a YouTube video once while ignoring all the actual historical context, like the Romans building their empire by fighting spear phalanxes with sword (and javelin) based legions.

        • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          At close range the spear becomes a staff which can block the knife and give a concussion thwack.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      You only get a short time with the pointy end of the spear and then once a sword wielder is inside your range, you’ve got an unwieldy stick and they have a sword. Good for stand off melee maybe but prob not.

      Yes, but getting in close without getting stabbed is really hard.
      Here’s an actual example of modern HEMA folks giving it a lot of goes:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLLv8E2pWdk

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        I fenced in college against people with slightly longer arms and just that minor difference put me at a huge disadvantage.

        • Phineaz@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I feel you. I know how many hits I can get in just stabbing at unexpected moments at long range with my sword, with a spear it would be plenty easier.