• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    And some of us live in Jurisdictions with 90%+ renewable electricity. My EV emissions are practically non-existent.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re really the only option in rural areas like where I live at this point. I’d like to see more busses (we have hourly service along a nearby main road to only a single destination) but until we make them self driving and electric to reduce operating costs, there’s simply no way the district could afford to run them frequently enough to be a viable alternative to cars.

        I did use busses extensively while I lived in the city though. I wish they were cheaper (or free) though.

    • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your EV still had manufacturing emissions for raw materials and building the car, transport emissions getting the car to the dealer, shares a portion of road maintaince emissions, and will have “end of life” emissions when the car is scrapped.

      Your EV emissions are not “non-existent”.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        10 months ago

        See, the problem with that math, is that it ignores the fact that I would own a car regardless. A gas vehicle would have similar (yes EVs have slightly higher manufacturing emissions) base emissions, in addition to the tailpipe. They cancel out when you compare car to car. My emissions, compared to driving a gas model, are non-existent, which I guess is a clarification that you need.

        Unfortunately for my total emissions, I live in a rural area, there isn’t even a bus that would get my kids to hockey practice, let alone games in a 2 hour driving radius.