• DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    You can abuse studios right now. This would not change that. It would not make maintenance risky or more expensive.

    It provides an extremely theoretical motive for people to do the abuse, that is unlikely to materialize in reality.

    And if you want to be theoretical, it removes ideological reasons for abuse. Right now, if you dislike an online game, and got the studio shut down, the game would be gone. With this initiative, it would survive removing the motivation to try in the first place.

    • aesthelete@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      It provides an extremely theoretical motive for people to do the abuse, that is unlikely to materialize in reality.

      Yeah, this whole argument seems like a theoretical spurious hypothetical.

      The dude in the video is acting like this is completely legal too, when all of the abuse is already illegal and the authorities just cannot prevent it because of the scale and size of the Internet combined with their own ineptitude.

      If I’m in the business generally of blowing up and attacking company servers, why would I suddenly want to pivot to hosting monetized game servers? That’s an entirely different business. The whole thing strikes me as “OH NOES SOMEBODY MIGHT MAKE SOME MONEY OFF OF MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES!!!”.

      Centralized, proprietary servers for games other than subscription MMO games are complete and utter bullshit. Either make the game a subscription and keep all of it server-side, or allow people to host the servers and stop acting like assholes.