MacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 days agoMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayexternal-linkmessage-square163fedilinkarrow-up1941arrow-down119
arrow-up1922arrow-down1external-linkMay the torque be with you lemmy.todayMacN'Cheezus@lemmy.today to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-24 days agomessage-square163fedilink
minus-squarefallingcats@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up32arrow-down1·3 days agoIt works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
minus-squareMadison420@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down3·3 days agoIt works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
minus-squareKitathalla@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·3 days agoSlight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
minus-squareevergreen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 days agoCorrect. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
minus-squareFridgeratr@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 days agoWell, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol
It works, but badly. All my homies hate cam-out and love torx.
It works great for it’s intended purpose which is torque limiting.
Slight myth there. It was not the intended purpose, but a sort of happy accident. The original patent stated it was a perfect, never damaging thing. See here and the reply here.
Correct. The original patent makes no reference to any sort of cam out / torque limiting feature.
Well, limiting torque but killing itself and becoming extremely hard to remove is terrible design lol