So I’m 20 and I’ve started looking at the salaries of jobs/careers, and this is the impression I’ve gotten. Like that you could spend years cramming a ton of knowledge about a very niche field, and still only get 2-3x what a run-of-the-mill job makes. Is this true? If yes then I guess this route to wealth would only make sense (due to the diminishing returns) if the topic truly spoke to you, right? Are there alternative career paths to good pay than being really good at something really specific?

  • MissJinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Its funny, I’m.the one that makes the least amout of money in my team. They hired 2 new people and both make 30% more than me. Besides the fact that I’m a woman I’m the one that puts the least effort into things and I don’t want to be promoted or to have “more responsibility” so I’m fine with it and so is the company. I do the bare minimun and go home happy. no extra learning, certifications, politics…nothing.

    • SubArcticTundra@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      That must be nice, it’s my plan too tbh if it still manages to pay the bills. I agree it’s important to have a sense of Enough.

  • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Salary really depends on value provided or enabled. That’s why more knowledge stops mattering at a certain point, someone with a month of experience driving a forklift is less valuable than someone with 3 years, but 6 years of experience isn’t significantly different.

    There’s also benefits to being closer to money to show value. This is why sales jobs tend to pay better, as showing direct responsibility for 1 million in sales vs keeping the machines running that made the product.

    • SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I actually just got told something similar. In a resume was listed, “over 10 years of leadership/management experience” and the recruiter reviewed it and said, “i don’t care. I can find 20 other people within two minutes who have 10+ years of experience. Tell me what the skills are.”

      Tenure in a position means very little. Every year is a diminished return of value.

  • onoki@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I think there are many good replies already, but I feel one consideration is missing: time.

    If you have the time for only one job, why wouldn’t you take one paying more, even if it requires a bit more skills to achieve? You are going to do that for a long while, so living more comfortably has a value.

  • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Get into politics.

    Replace “expert knowledge” with “knowledge about how to manipulate people to vote for you”

    Take bribes. Listens to whats your puppet-masters tell you to vote.

    Ez money.

    /s

        • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          my understanding is the that green line represents the linear relation of salary to knowledge which OP would consider fair and just. therefore the part where red line is above the green one means people who earn below average are overpaid for their knowledge and professional contribution. and similarly, the part where the red line is below the green one means people who earn above average are underpaid

    • Not_mikey@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      X is years of experience , y is a combined axis, technical knowledge for the green line and salary for the red line

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is somewhat off topic, but it is actually related to knowledge, income, and returns.

    I’m telling you from experience, make enough money to live comfortably and stop when you get there. If at all possible, don’t have a long commute. Don’t have a prestige job. Don’t have a position that requires OT or sprints. I deescalated my role to something more banal and my happiness went way up.

    You’re likely not in a position to do that at 20, but when you get somewhat into a career and life sucks and you hate your work and you want to die, start looking for something that pays less but also doesn’t suck the life out of you.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Generally speaking, wealth is not built by working. It’s built by investing. It’s possible to have a relatively small salary and get relatively wealthy if you consistently live below your means and invest the surplus. Power of compounding.

  • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    [off topic]

    There’s at least one store I know of in New York City that’s been making money off of doing VCR repairs for decades. A lot of companies invested in big video displays back in the day and it would cost far more to replace everything than it does to keep the antique tech going.

    Some people are still learning Cobol.

    https://www.cio.com/article/240709/why-its-time-to-learn-cobol.html

    If you can find a niche tech like that it would make sense.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Amateur. You need to get a PhD to be some tenured fogie’s personal whipping boy. /s

    If you’re looking at actual good paying jobs and not weird passion-fueled ones, or at the other end bullshit nepobaby ones, maybe this is accurate, IDK.

  • vatlark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I would certainly recommend picking a field of study and work for more reasons than just the money. As a counter point to your plot, I have seen small career moves result in huge pay increases.

  • qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    The amount of money you save (and invest) isn’t accurately depicted with this though. Living expenses don’t necessarily grow with take home, if you keep lifestyle creep to a minimum.

    So what this means is that if you make $100k and save $10k/year, if you start making $200k you can save the same $10k/year, plus the entire additional $100k after taxes (let’s just say that’s $50k+). So you doubled your salary but your savings went up 6x+.

  • theturtlemoves [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I don’t think there’s a strong relation between knowledge and salary. It’s more likely demand and supply - if specific skills are in demand, and not many people have them, then pay will increase. And at the highest levels it’s often not what you know, but who you know that matters.

  • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    After many careers and much money earned and spent, I now try to go by „ikigai“. Its a japanese theory and teaches you to be aware of what it is that you want, what makes you money, what the world needs and what you‘re good at, basically. This is how I went from a very well paid but soul sucking job to a lesser paid but much more fulfilling work.

    For me it was building computers and the stuff around it. Its fun and it makes decent money if done right.

    Good luck!