• cicyphus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Yeah, I think this is the big difference. We have the capacity to rationalize and introspect. If we can make a change for the better (and know we can), how do we justify not making it?

    Sometimes the reason is “it’s hard” or an apathetic “it doesn’t matter”. But I think it’s very difficult to come to the conclusion that it’s (consumption of meat) the correct thing to do.

    I say this as someone who commonly falls into the “it’s tough” bucket.

    • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Actually, humans are animals. Once you view them in that light, the “I don’t want to stop eating meat” becomes “I can’t stop eating meat, because I am actually an animal who believe it is above instinct”.

      • Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        55 minutes ago

        I feel like this ignores the point many are making here.

        The statement that we are animals is true. But as many have pointed out, we have the extra layer of reasoning, introspection, and empathy.

        We can see the pain and torture subjected on other animals and reson that it is unjustified and empathise with the pain by thinking about how we would feel if in the shoes of the animals being slaughtered. We can look at outlr actions and decide to make a change.

        None of this, as far as we know, is possible for any other animal.

        This is a huge distinction and one that, as i said, you have either missed or ignored whilst reading these comments.