• dx1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    “Greatest fool” description relies on the precept of its utility or demand returning to zero in a near-future timeframe. If people have utility for “the thing”, that won’t be the case.

    • ubergeek@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      There is no utility really, for ponzicoins. You can’t make anything from it. You can use it to make anything. You can’t eat it. You can’t hydrate with it. And you can’t use the notes to summon military aid.

      I suppose you can buy drugs with it. Maybe.

      So yes, it’s a Greatest Fool game.

      • dx1@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Yes, for the limited subset of ERC20s or whatever you describe as “ponzicoins”. Things that actually do nothing, particular not doing anything more than L1 cryptos but “this is yet another token”, are not really adding any value. But I would be really surprised if you can name any more complex contracts than ERC20s (or ERC721s), which is where the work in the space actually goes.

          • dx1@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            Yes, work. Smart contracts are designed, programmed and, if they’re done right, rigorously audited for correctness. Then you have user-facing interface and everything surrounding that as well. Look at the documentation of AAVE, for one example.

            And this isn’t even getting into the protocol level (L1 or L2) work either. Bitcoin was relatively simple, Ethereum is not. They’ve spent years crafting these systems to function for PoS, L2 support, sharding, rollups, etc., at scale.

            • ubergeek@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Smart contracts are designed, programmed and, if they’re done right, rigorously audited for correctness.

              What do these “smart contracts” make? And why do we need to burn up tons of fossil fuels, just to have contracts like we had before?

              And how is this better than a typical contract?

              https://www.zdnet.com/article/hackers-hijack-smart-contracts-in-new-cryptocurrency-token-rug-pull-scams/

              Bitcoin was relatively simple, Ethereum is not.

              Both are simple ponzi schemes.

              They’ve spent years crafting these systems to function for PoS, L2 support, sharding, rollups, etc., at scale.

              And all that time, they are still ponzi schemes that do none of the above very well. We’ve had all of that in the merchant payment systems for decades now, all without the need to consume more electricity than many small nations, just to approve a transaction.