• HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    153
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Tho I support gun ownership, this guy has no business owning a gun

    “If you are a [in my perception] a communist, you don’t wanna step on my lawn” === “If I don’t agree with you, I’ll shoot you”

    Plus anyone saying “communist states” is definetly fallen victim of right wing propaganda and haven’t even take the time to research what communisim is. Even the US left political wing is quite capitalisitic.

    Just a bunch of bad “arguments” bagged up with slapsticks words which he doesn’t even know the meaning of.

    • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      85
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I watched this guy for a little bit and liked his Linux stuff and then in one video he started ranting about how those FOSS licenses that include a requirement to use software ethically are the worst thing in the universe because they bring politics into software and I thought “wait, this guy is ignorant asshole isn’t he?” and turns out yes, yes he is.

      Not making the point to defend those licenses or not but all this guy cared about was FOSS not being political and it’s like…are you a child? Do you not understand how all of this is political?

      People like this guy give FOSS a really ugly outward facing identity and it turns away soooo many potential contributors and chill people.

      To your point about this guy being exactly the kind of person that shouldn’t be allowed to own a precision semiautomatic rifle with 30 round magazines of high caliber rifle rounds, I agree, I have seen that guy get so fucking angry about shit on his channel, he has no ability to control his anger and that kind of person shouldn’t be allowed to own an object that gives their temper tantrums the capacity to kill so many people so quickly before their rational control kicks back in.

      • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        52
        ·
        9 months ago

        “I don’t wanna get political in this video”

        Get’s mega political and starts using political lingo used by the right wing

        Way to go, dude, you played yourself.

        I’ve also seen his temper in his videos plus adding what he said in this video, I am convinced the guy should not be allowed to own a damm BBGun. But he’s lucky he doesnt live in a “communist state”. Yo what a shitshow.

        • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’ve also seen his temper in his videos plus adding what he said in this video, I am convinced the guy should not be allowed to own a damm BBGun. But he’s lucky he doesnt live in a “communist state”. Yo what a shitshow.

          You can see with these conservative white men when they clearly perceive a threatening universe everywhere they look based on their ideology. It is what directly leads to their irrational bouts of anger and violence, and causes things like…

          "A 14-year-old African-American boy stopped to ask for directions to school in a Detroit suburb but was shot at instead, according to prosecutors…I got to the house and I knocked on the lady’s door. Then she started yelling at me and she was like, ‘Why are you trying to break into my house?’ " Walker told local station WJBK. “And I was trying to explain to her that I was trying to get directions to Rochester High. And she kept yelling at me. The guy came downstairs, and then he grabbed the gun, and I saw it and started to run. And that’s when I heard the gunshot,” he told the station.

          the same old story over and over again

          Rightwing white men afraid of the world and thus ready to project anger and violence at the slightest confirmation of whatever dumb bullshit they believe in isn’t a cute look for any community, which is probably why these people tend to feel so isolated in the first place…

          • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            ·
            9 months ago

            Exactly. In a way there IS a “threat” for them, that they will not be anymore at the top of the pyramid, they see it as the “woke, communist, liberals” or whatever trying to subdue them, ironically what they want is to be able to further subdue everyone else.

            Also ironic and sad: poor (poor as in not rich) white men were never at the top, they were just as exploited as the rest, the are just made belive they weren’t. Of course they enjoy some extra perks, mostly judicial, but they have more in common with a poor black guy than with a millioner and nothing with a billioner

            What a world we have. But at the very least is never dull.

            • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              “But what about my illegally obtained riches and privileges? My family enslaved people for hundreds of years, I’m nobility, and you’re just going to come to my home and take what is not yours? What about MY rights? Don’t rock the boat, keep everything the way it’s always been, meaning that I can enjoy royal privileges at the expense of other people’s suffering, famine, violence, and death. Or are you a filthy COMMUNIST?!”

          • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            9 months ago

            It’s funny. I work with a bunch of righteimg guys a an energy cooperative which is pretty much light communism as it is collectively owned by the consumers without the ability for capital accumulation.

        • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Some portions of the far right are allergic to being called “political”. Even outright Nazis often claim to be moderate. Part of the reason they end up having those beliefs is from a profound lack of awareness of self and others. They thus can convince themselves that they are the moderates, and everyone else is extreme

          • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            9 months ago

            Of course, is easier to maintain your belives if you see yourself as “moderate” or “apolitical”. Is easier if you belive your line of toughts are share by a “silent majority” thus making it reasonable and moderate.

            Just mental hops to affirm themselves.

            Sounds a bit like insecurity to me, they don’t see or feel themselves as in the position or capacity to justify what they belive in, so they refuge behind “Is just common sense” or “we are the majority”, “is not political”, basically a post modern rehash of the naturalistic argument.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Propaganda works as a motherfucker, it did 80 years ago, it did 800 years ago, it did 8000 years ago and it is fucking AI weaponized today.

          You want communism? Leave FOX on in your home at all times, you may not turn it off, you can lower the volume somewhat but it’s still on as you sleep, and if you disable it the dark men come and enable it again while you’re at work, and leave you with a little reminder and write your name in a little black leather bound notebook and tell your neighbors to report any suspicious behavior or they might be next up for a visit.

          To someone who has experience, the GOP is Stalinism in disguise. They don’t hate communists, they hate that they don’t get to be the oppressors. They are 100% the same shit.

      • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        9 months ago

        I had an interaction a few weeks ago where I made the same obvious statement – that everything is political, like the price of milk is political – and the someone said I was making it political, like gun rights.

        That conversation stopped there unfortunately, but it made me realize something.

        Politicized is different from political for a lot of people.

        Maybe most people realize the price of gas is political, but they don’t think that their internet bill, or whatever, is political. It’s just market forces to them, or whatever they assume about capitalism being good.

        Ultimately, I think my point is that when people say things like foss shouldn’t be political, I think they’re saying they agree, but they would lose their in-group status be agreeing with something “woke” like ethics in software. So they have to make a proxy argument about what is and isn’t political.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          You know what solves this?

          Education.

          You know what this nation does not have?

          Education*.

          (* terms and conditions apply)

          • half_built_pyramids@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Agreed.

            Funny that I think you tapped into another politicized proxy argument here. People want their kids to get a good education, but they didn’t want it to be woke.

            Things were better when it was puritanical teaching and sex – and anything about sex – was bad and parents didn’t have to think about their little horny teenagers touching each other. Gross, right?

            Hence, book bans instead of education funding.

      • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        This is like that time I discovered a dude who reviewed camping equipment and watched like ten of his videos and then all of a sudden it went from “top ten hatchets for the back country” to “Zionist lizard Jews are stealing our testosterone to make us compliant.”

        It took me months to convince YouTube to stop showing me anti woke content.

        • dumpsterlid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Once YouTube decides you might be a good candidate for rightwing radicalization or conspiracy theories, good luck getting the algorithm to show you anything else lol. I am honestly surprised you even got the algorithm off that in 5 months. YouTube has permanently decided I am a good target to manipulate into conspiracies and rightwing content based on the fact that it has figured out I am a white man and I watch YouTube. Does it matter the only youtube political content I watch is leftist YouTube channels like the Majority Report? It does not.

        • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          I watched one guy’s channel where he travelled and filmed megalithic structures around the world, until out of the blue one day he just started ranting about wokeness and gays and soy liberals or whatever the fuck.

          I am so fucking done with literally both sides of that red herring being dangled in front of hyenas to keep them killing each other over the scraps instead of biting the hand that enslaves them.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        There is zero correlation between technical acuity and moral maturity.

        Being good at doing something does not make you a moral person. It’s easy to get it wrong because society actually, consciously and ubiquitly promotes and reinforces the equivalence.

    • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Just today I was reading some really concerning articles from Raymond along these lines.

      http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8708 http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=8752

      "I had business outside today. I needed to go in towards Philly, closer to the riots, to get a new PSU put into the Great Beast. I went armed; I’ve been carrying at all times awake since Philadelphia started to burn and there were occasional reports of looters heading into the suburbs in other cities.

      I knew I might be heading into civil unrest today. It didn’t happen. But it still could.

      Therefore I’m announcing my rules of engagement should any of the riots connected with the atrocious murder of George Floyd reach the vicinity of my person.

      I will shoot any person engaging in arson or other life-threatening behavior, issuing a warning to cease first if safety permits. Blacks and other minorities are otherwise safe from my gun; they have a legitimate grievance in the matter of this murder, and what they’re doing to their own neighborhoods and lives will be punishment enough for the utter folly of their means of expression once the dust settles. White rioters, on the other hand, will be presumed to be Antifa Communists attempting to manipulate this tragedy for Communist political ends; them I consider “enemies-general of all mankind, to be dealt with as wolves are” and will shoot immediately, without mercy or warning. UPDATE: I didn’t mention white nationalists because I judge my chances of encountering any member of that tiny, ineffectual movement to be effectively zero, and I refuse to cooperate with the mass-media fiction that they are a significant factor in this crisis.

      We don’t have a problem with white nationalists attempting to burn down our country using black people as tools and proxies. We have a problem with Communists doing that. I insist on naming – and if necessary, shooting – the real enemy."

      -ESR

      Scratch a right-libertarian…

      • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Man, that is some concerning shit, pardon my french. Really concerning shit.

        Im just speachless tbh. I talk a lot, you can see it in this threat, but I can only say about that, that it is some very concerning shit.

        Does he fancy himself to be Batman or what?

        • rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I think he fancied himself as what Rittenhouse fancied himself. If you check the dates, the “Rules for Rioters” post predates the Rittenhouse one.

          But yeah, it was concerning enough to even leave an Argentino friend of mine, who voted for Milei no less, speechless.

        • Enkrod@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          He’s just waiting for the Reichstag to burn down, so he can blame the communists and enact some Enabling Act of 1933 2025

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I mean he basically admits that his beliefs structure is just following the herd and that he hasn’t put any effort into understanding philosophical first principles. I wouldn’t think about it too hard.

    • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I think everyone should be able to own nerve gas.

      Not THIS guy, of course, but everyone else.

      • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        Hmmm… I never said that. You’re misreprensenting my words.

        Maybe what I meant is that there should be clear and hard rules for gun ownership? Maybe I did mean that only him should not be able to own one, perhaps I even meant that only people I agree with shoud own guns. Is not possible to for you to know what I generally believe about ownership and regulation only from my comment above. So please do not put words in my mouth.

        Also, bold statement comming from someone with a clear wink to Anarchy in their handle.

    • Morefan@retrolemmy.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      “That isn’t happening”

      While that position held, Marx now acknowledged that the standard of living of the wage earners advances with every progressive stride the bourgeoisie take. The matter, then, was more relative than absolute. Marx had now fully grown up.

      https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/we-are-all-marxists-liberal-democrats-have-understood-the-communist-manifesto-better-than-communists/

      • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Imo, a problem with Marx, is that tha the languaje he used lend itself to very broad interpretations, thus making it easy to absorb him into whatever ideology/plan/scheme.

        People who like Stalin or Mao and in a lesser degree Trotsky and Lennin -which to whom we nowadays call commnunists- used his languaje to reaffirm their ideas. Even tho imo their ideoligical brand was quite a ways out of Marx.

        • Overshoot2648@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yeah, it’s annoying to talk to some self described communists. There was one guy who said consumer cooperatives were capitalist despite the fact that they are communally owned, don’t allow for capital accumulation, and are literally a form of organization Marx endorsed, but the guy I was arguing told me I needed to do more reading. Consumer cooperatives are a little more on the Anarchist side close to worker cooperatives, but they are most definitely socialist.

          • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            I saw a guy here in Lemmy arguing once that the nordics are socialists contries… The dude also told the comenters trying to explain why is not true to go read… I get they were confused and I belive is a easy mistake to make, but he had so many good comments explaining in a calm and easy way why he wasn’t right and he keept just deying it.

            There is just sadly too much (miss)information out there and most people dont have the interest, energy or (and in a lesser degree) the capacity to exercise critical thinking and reading.

        • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          He’s a product of the structuralism which dominated the industrial era philosophy. It’s incredibly obvious if you study political science even a little bit, and it’s the easiest angle of criticism towards any orthodox theory of the era. Stalin and Mao are very much in that same modernist camp. That’s why I just roll my eyes at internet communists who consider themselves well read because they have Marxist.org bookmarked. These are people who think the biggest problem with Jacobin is not enough fan service.

          All this stuff is just laughably outdated. The most annoying part is that it has been updated to reflect more modern philosophy, but they never want to hear it. They see contemporary leftist thought as Marxist revisionism and just compromising with liberals, which is the worst sin imaginable.

          • HappyRedditRefugee@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            People forget that Marx advocated for ruthless criticisim. As a rule whenever I read something and it peeks my interest, before I keep digging further I ask myself: Where’s the catch here? Are they trying to sell me something? Who can actually benefit from this.

            This simple scruttiny maybe won’t reveal the holes in the idea, but it will lead you to things you can research, read contra-arguments and get a fuller and rounder idea of whatever you are reading. But sadly this is a skill that is getting loss, not because people can’t intellectually do it, they just do not care or want to put the effort.