• Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      But 2013 Netflix didn’t have to compete with Prime Video, Disney Plus, Paramount Plus, HBO Max, Apple TV, Hulu, Peacock, or any of the million “add-on” channels that Amazon uses as an excuse to paywall you off from the content.

      The fact that they all run in their own UI, desperate the shove the next instalment of mediocrity down your throat, means that I’ve gone back to piracy. It’s just much easier to type what I’m after into Radarr or Sonarr than it is to go through the services to see what’s available. Sure, I can use Justwatch, but 80% of the time what I’m after isn’t on anything I have.

      • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        More competition should mean lower prices. How is competition diving prices up? Seems rigged.

        • Blackmist@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Same amount of content, more players, outbidding each other, passing on those lovely reverse savings.

          See if it was like music, with a massive back catalogue available to everyone, you’d have four or five services competing on price. But it isn’t. And it will suffer for that.

        • jimbolauski@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Streaming services are middle men with exclusivity rights on products. They sell simular but different things, think of them like dealership repair shops, they both fix cars but they fix different cars.