• Sibshops@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I think there’s a technical hurdle here. There’s no reliable way to enforce unique access to an NFT. Anyone with access to the wallet’s private key (or seed phrase) can use the NFT, meaning two or more people could easily share a game or software license just by sharing credentials. That kind of undermines the licensing control in a system like this.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      two or more people could easily share a game or software license just by sharing credentials

      So like disks? Before everything started checking hwids. Just like the comment said, it would make corporations less money so they wouldn’t do it.

      • Transtronaut@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Well, that’s the point. In order for that system to work as described, you would need some kind of centralized authority to validate and enforce it. Once you’ve introduced that piece, there’s no point using NFTs anymore - you can just use any kind of simpler and more efficient key/authentication mechanism.

        So even if the corporations wanted to use such a system (which, to your point, they do not), it still wouldn’t make sense to use NFTs for it.

      • Sibshops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It’s easier to share on a blockchain. I can send the license to a new wallet then have the wallet sign a smart contract which could automatically drain it of any gas if anyone adds it.

        Now I can give out the secret pass phrase and lots of people can play the game without having to give anyone my login credentials.