• weker01@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The people working on LLMs also call it AI. Just that LLMs are a small subset in the AI research area. That is every LLM is AI but not every AI is an LLM.

    Just look at the conference names the research is published in.

    • WraithGear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Maybe, still doesn’t mean that the label AI was ever warranted, nor that the ones who chose it had a product to sell. The point still stands. These systems do not display intelligence any more than a Rube Goldberg machine is a thinking agent.

      • 0ops@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        These systems do not display intelligence any more than a Rube Goldberg machine is a thinking agent.

        Well now you need to define “intelligence” and that’s wandering into some thick philosophical weeds. The fact is that the term “artificial intelligence” is as old as computing itself. Go read up on Alan Turing’s work.

          • 0ops@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            That’s just kicking the can down the road, because now you have to define agency. Do you have agency? If you didn’t, would you even know? Can you prove it either way? In any case, this is no longer a scientific discussion, but a philosophical one, because whether or not an entity has “intelligence” or “agency” are not testable questions.