• CableMonster@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    There is no badge for not hiring people. Its better to hire someone and treat them better than another employer than pretend like you are virtuous and not “profiting from their labor”.

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      An interesting thought. A kind of harm reduction. Alternately (or perhaps coinciding) I’m very interested in workers co-ops where the distinction between employee/er kinda goes away. You can still have managers and people setting the quarterly goals or whatever, but they aren’t “above” you, except maybe in their skill at managing people.

      • CableMonster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        I am all in favor of any work relationship that is consensual. I just dont like it when people keep wanting to make laws that “protect employees” when they are actually harming everyone instead.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          Wow when the billionaires are worried about income inequality you know the shit has gone too far. It’s like it’s not even fun for them anymore.

          Thought provoking article. Thank you got sharing. I certainly don’t agree with everything said, but it’s interesting to hear a different view.

          • Demosthememes@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            I remembered that Cuban was on record for saying & doing this & that link was the easiest to source from because so many people know who he is. I wanted to highlight the deed itself. More recently, was the open letter written by over 250 billionaires & multi-millionaires pleading to be taxed more than they currently are.
            As you say, you know it’s almost pitchfork levels when the letter, which was read at WEF in Davos, says

            “Our request is simple: we ask you to tax us, the very richest in society. This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations’ economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future.”

            According to the article, “Imposing a 2% tax on the world’s billionaires alone would raise almost $250 billion annually”
            Question is, why are governments so reluctant to grant them this?