• fiat_lux@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    No documented leadership hierarchy or organisation structure when there’s more than maybe 10 people working there. If you have to waste your time fighting out who everyone is and you can’t do it in a single meeting where everyone can introduce themselves, then the place is too big to not document roles and responsibilities officially. It leads to closed circles of people who hold the necessary historical knowledge to get anything done.

          • intensely_human@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 months ago

            Traditionally people had to suffer in solitude. But I represent the Extroverted Busybody Network.

            We take inhuman lonely conditions and make sure people get constant company.

            So far we’re on track to eliminate all non-roommate apartment housing in Boise by 2025!

            Spreading the Joy of Togetherness. Universally.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Secret Teams chats that only the ingroup is part of, yet often at all-staff meetings they mention their inside jokes from the chat and then go “oh whoops only some people will understand haha”

  • tias@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    When there is both Cisco video conferencing equipment and Skype/Teams-certified devices in the conference rooms because they are managed by two different departments that purchased conference equipment separately.