The ancient Romans thought a large penis was less desirable. You could mock someone for being big.
Well yes but no. Aesthetically, it was considered vulgar. So was drinking wine “raw”, but people still got plenty drunk all the time. And no matter the fashion of the statues of the time, sex still worked the same.
It’s the patriarchy that defined large dicks as more masculine and “good”. You think “small penis” is an insult because you were taught that it was.
Fun fact. The ancient Romans thought a large penis was less desirable. You could mock someone for being big.
Well yes but no. Aesthetically, it was considered vulgar. So was drinking wine “raw”, but people still got plenty drunk all the time. And no matter the fashion of the statues of the time, sex still worked the same.
Exactly. The G spot is like 2" inside, and people still have fingers and tongues.
Sure, I would agree with that, but just because it’s root cause is the patriarchy does not mean that something that hurts men is actually misogyny.
Yeah, I think misogyny was the wrong term. They’re not the same.