• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    The blockchain is distributed.

    For example, you might use it as a trademark registry or to certify a chain of legal evidence. You can validate a presented copy matches the original and what the chain of ownership was. And you can do this without the single point of failure of a nationwide database

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        That’s the point, a use case where no one has to. It’s only the record of ownership.

        And clearly you’d still need to make arrangements to prevent multiple chains of ownership for a copied artifact

        NFTs make the mistake of assuming that somehow makes it unique, forgetting you can just copy the original. However these use cases work from the opposite direction: given an accused infringement, does that match?

        Consider the current use case for trademark. Someone creates a trademark and registers with an authority. At some point they may renew modify, or sell. After some time, that authority has a database containing the original and a chain of ownership. Blockchain could serve this identically, with the potential advantage of the chain being self contained and distributable