• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Have you been to an American school recently? The elementary next to my house could be confused for a prison at first glance. It hasn’t gotten bad, if anything it’s actually safer than when we went to school. They have promoted a society of individuals ruled by fear.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        In the home, mostly, yep. Outside the home is statistically safer now than almost any other time. Overall crime is down to historic lows.

        Ironically, at this point, and for the last 30 years in the US, owning a gun makes you more susceptible to gun violence. That may be changing, but I seriously doubt it since the cops are now public enemy #1, and have been since the mid '90s.

        Oh and before you try to defend the thugs with badges, they were declaring war on the public all throughout the '80s and '90s, by using yellow journalism and Hollywood to manufacture a “war on cops,” because people were rightfully questioning qualified immunity. It didn’t exist until Harlow V Fitzgerald in 1982. It shouldn’t exist at all according to the law as written and recorded in The Congressional Record.

        US cops have always been nothing more than glorified slave hunters. It seems that nothing changes in that criminal organization. The DOJ is still reporting that cops commit far more crime than all of the arraigned, but not convicted, potential criminals in the US.

    • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      @AngryCommieKender In my time you didn’t hear of school shootings. They just didn’t happen. So there was less need for the draconian security. My high school was open campus, and my Jr high we were at least allowed to leave during lunch. Different world today entirely. And I don’t like it because it conditions people for 15 minute cities and other forms of tyranny.

      • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        … it conditions people for 15 minute cities and other forms of tyranny

        Are you saying you think the idea of having all important services within 15 minutes is tyranny?

          • Xavienth@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Literally nobody thinks 15 minute cities should mean you’re stuck in a 15 minute radius you dork

              • silasmariner@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 hours ago

                Where do you think this has been implemented? I’m curious, because you’re the first person I’ve come across who was this take, and it’s novel to me.

                • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 hour ago

                  @silasmariner xford City Council have publicly stated that the 15-minute city concept does not involve travel restrictions and that traffic filters are not intended to confine people to their local area. If the “travel filters” are not intended to confine people to their local area, then what is their intent? Yea, to confine people.

                  • silasmariner@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    1 hour ago

                    Wow, hot take. Do you know what a traffic filter is? It’s just a restriction on through traffic, so that smaller roads aren’t used as part of a route by people going longer distances. It in no way restricts the overall distance that people can travel. In fact it’s less restrictive than some LTN implementations, since at least the road can still be traversed

                • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 hours ago

                  @Horse No I grew up in a time where we had relative freedom. If I wanted to go lay on the beach and enjoy the stars and the sound of surf at 2AM, I could so so, if I wanted to set off fireworks on the 4th of July I could so so, or pretty much any other time as long as I wasn’t creating a nuisance. I could drive downtown on any street. Now beaches are closed after dark, no more fireworks, kind of funny that we don’t have the freedom to celebrate our freedoms, but then the constitution may as well be used for toilet paper these days, downtown now half the streets are bus only and the other half are one-way. I don’t understand young peoples total lack of desire for freedom.

          • ShrimpCurler@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            I was confused because it’s such a bad take… That’s not what 15 minute cities are about. That’s just the dumb conspiracy theories.

          • aeischeid@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            your intent is NOT clear.

            restricted in your ability to travel is totally normal and not tyranny. Drivers licences are smart, Pilot license make sense, dang are speed limits tyranny?

            15 minutes cities is just a concept that all or most of the typically important services citizens need to survive and thrive should be within a 15 minutes of where they live without REQUIRING a car. Modern car dependent culture is the tyranny if anything, and 15 minute cities idea is a response to that

            • nanook@friendica.eskimo.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 hours ago

              @aeischeid For anyone capable of basic logic it would have been. Obviously having services readily available is not tyrannical, being unable to travel is, what other significant aspects of 15 minute cities are there? Do you really want your life controlled to this degree?

              • ebolapie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I have literally never seen the idea of a 15 minute city being restrictive anywhere other than the ravings of Alex Jones tier wingnuts. Everybody who actually pushes the concept just thinks you should have a grocery store, a doctor’s office, a library etc. near your house.

                Edit: and don’t get it twisted, nobody is saying you should be forced to relocate either, it’s a guideline for urban planning.

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        Same. I vaguely remember some shooting happening my Jr. Year of HS. I wanna say Bowling Green or Paducah, KY. This was before Columbine. Columbine was my Freshman year at Transylvania University.

    • Zenith@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Our most recent school levy addressed basically nothing but turning the schools into jails by wanting to hire a bunch of cops, install metal detectors and a bunch of other “security measures” and this is a rural small district, we have zero need for that stuff, why not propose paying teachers better, buying updated textbooks or funding after school care, something but I’m not and never will vote to turn our schools into prisons

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        There is a pervasive ideal in this country that has been a core part of it since the Pilgrims landed: Puritanical Ethics of “punishment is Divine, to suffer is to be Holy”

        Something is wrong? Punish the wrongness until it becomes righteous. If it doesn’t work then punish harder.

        It’s how this country has always solved its problems. Label the other as wicked then beat them into submission.