Great news! I started my selfhost journey over a year ago, and I’m finding myself needing better hardware. There’s so many services I want that my NAS can’t handle. And I unfortunately need to add GPU transcoding to my Jellyfin setup.

What’s the best OS for a machine focused on containers and (getting started with) VMs? I’ve heard Proxmox

What CPU specs should I be concerned about?

I’m willing to buy a pre-built as long as its hardware has sufficient longevity.

  • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 day ago

    Depending on how many bays your Synology is, you might be best off getting a nuc or a mini pc for compute and using your synology just for storage.

    • Lem453@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I did his when I moved from unraid because I wanted better infra as code for my dockers etc. Kept unraid with all my drives and use NFS mounts from another machine with proxmox that runs a VM for my dockers

    • Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the route I took too. NAS for storage and simple docker containers, Minipc for compute/GPU.

      • Bronzie@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I run a 4 bay and a N100 NUC.

        The Synology is almost a pure storage machine. Works really well with Proxmox on the side. Not a single file has made it kneel yet, and I’ve thrown some high bitrate badboys on it.

        Is not upgrading the drives an alternative?

        I feel like you sacrifice a lot of practicality removing the NAS, such as automatic backup from phones and very easy remote access.
        Personally I also prefer separating data and software, so I don’t lose it all if a component fails.

        Just my .02

      • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I have a 6 bay, so yeah that might be a little limiting. I have all my personal stuff backed up to an encrypted cloud mount, the bulk of my storage space is pirated media I could download again, and I have the Synology using SHR so I just plug in a bigger drive, expand the array, then plug in another bigger drive and repeat. Because of duplication sectors you might not benefit as much from that method with just 4 bays. Or if you have enough stuff you can’t feasible push to up to the cloud to give piece of mind during rebuilding I guess.

      • Zikeji@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        9? That’s quite a bit of compute lol.

        My journey started with 1 server, then 4, then 5 (one functioning as a NAS), then 1 (just the NAS box), then I moved and decided to slim it down to a proper NAS and 1 mini PC/NUC clone. Now I’m up to two because the first was an Intel N105 which just isn’t up for the challenges lol

        • curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          3 are for the family, 3 are for work stuff, 3 are for me as toys.

          (Plus a Mac mini and a p330 as spare desktops for me, thus the -ish)