• Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That is by no means AI generated, and certainly not by today’s understanding of the term. If I write a score and design an instrument (or sound, etc), that is still a creative process. Brian Eno literally created ambient music with algorithms like that, but it is still his creative work.

    My point is just computer-generated ≠ ai-generated in general discourse.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      What’s the difference? Why isn’t it seen as a collaboration between the person writing the prompt (using a scripting language) and the programmer/designer of the generation software and curator of the Data set?

      • Übercomplicated@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I’m not sure I entirely follow you (I’m only half awake, sorry), but programmed music is only generated by computers insofar the computer is generating 44100 samples every second based on a set of mathematical rules the composer made. AI music is generated based on huge datasets and probability; the composer has very little to no specific control.

        If I program a instrument/synth in Supercollidor or Pure Data or some hardware synth, and then sample the instrument/synth or create and sequence a melody for it on my MIDI (piano) keyboard or Schism Tracker, etc., I have complete and absolute control over everything, down to the very waveform. In that case I am truly and purely the creator of the piece.

        If I type in a prompt, I am just playing a probability lottery. I have done jack shit more than describing a piece of music.

        I might have misunderstood you though. For now, I’m going to bed. Good night!