• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    Average life expectancy included early childhood deaths. So if you made it to teenager, you would probably live to an old age close to what you might live to today.

    • Baguette@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Ehh not exactly. Yes infant mortality would skew the data a bit, but modern medicine, along with modern agriculture has definitely increased the average life expectancy by a sizable portion.

      Nowadays, people don’t have to worry about food stockpiles and periods of shortages. Malnutrition was definitely a big issue back then. Especially with things like baby food being present, which was a big factor in reducing baby death rates

      Modern medicine such as vaccines, surgeries, supplements, and even basic hygiene has made wonders for the average health of a person. Things that would normally kill a person, like bacteria infecting a wound, nowadays is mostly recoverable and minor.

      If you look back even just a century, life expectancy was a lot lower than the present. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1040079/life-expectancy-united-states-all-time/

      • fading_person@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        In isolated communities without any of our tech and science advancement, like the kalahari, it’s common for people to live into old age, so getting into your 80s or something isn’t something new in our society. Statistically, more people are getting into older age, but that doesn’t mean young people were considered old.