You underestimate how small (and therefore many) atoms are…

Caesar’s Last Breath Theory estimates that roughly one molecule of Caesar’s last breath will appear in your next breath.

I believe that theory doesn’t take into account the breakdown and reforming of molecules into component atoms over time, but still…

Or a space key.

But you get two Fn keys next to each other, so it’s got that going for it.

I think he says “watch this!” before he jumps.

They’re made that way so you don’t accidentally connect a gas cylinder to a water line.

Simon Sebastian - Into The Atmosphere

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiv_(weapon)

Inmates make knives out of the weirdest things.

Dread it, run from it…

Mmm, high tea… Haven’t played that in a while.

Ok, I guess the idea that the CMB suggests movement relative to a quasi-absolute reference frame really has become disputed lately… I also found this newer paper by the same authors. It’s a pity, I liked the idea.

Well, following the main reference in the Wikipedia page leads to this:

The implied velocity for the Solar System barycenter is v = 369.82 ± 0.11 km s−1, assuming a value T0 = Tγ , towards (l, b) = (264.021◦ ± 0.011◦, 48.253◦ ± 0.005◦) [13]. Such a Solar System motion implies a velocity for the Galaxy and the Local Group of galaxies relative to the CMB. The derived value is vLG = 620 ± 15 km s−1 towards (l, b) = (271.9◦ ± 2.0◦, 29.6◦ ± 1.4◦) [13], where most of the error comes from uncertainty in the velocity of the Solar System relative to the Local Group. The dipole is a frame-dependent quantity, and one can thus determine the ‘CMB frame’ (in some sense this is a special frame) as that in which the CMB dipole would be zero. Any velocity of the receiver relative to the Earth and the Earth around the Sun is removed for the purposes of CMB anisotropy studies, while our velocity relative to the Local Group of galaxies and the Local Group’s motion relative to the CMB frame are normally removed for cosmological studies. The dipole is now routinely used as a primary calibrator for mapping experiments, either via the time- varying orbital motion of the Earth, or through the cosmological dipole measured by satellite experiments.

Do any references suggest this dipole is under debate?

Is it controversial? I thought it was pretty established. In Wikipedia it says:

From the CMB data, it is seen that the Sun appears to be moving at 369.82±0.11 km/s relative to the reference frame of the CMB (also called the CMB rest frame, or the frame of reference in which there is no motion through the CMB). The Local Group — the galaxy group that includes our own Milky Way galaxy — appears to be moving at 620±15 km/s in the direction of galactic longitude ℓ = 271.9°±2°, b = 30°±3°.[88] The dipole is now used to calibrate mapping studies.

Relative to the Cosmic Microwave Background. Seems to be the closest thing to an absolute reference frame.

Something moving that fast wouldn’t stay “north” of anyone’s location long enough for them to finish saying that…

Looks a bit like the Arachne browser for DOS.

With a lot of junk inside yo trunk.

Whenever cognitive behavioral therapy is mentioned with an initialism there’s this risk of losing it to immature giggling when you substitute that other meaning for “CBT”…

Are we all just going to ignore aquariums?

I don’t mean it’s not thicker, i mean it looks like it has the same diameter.

How is the top smaller though? It looks identical. There must be another reason.

Out of anger at someone roundabout predicting you will kill them.