• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    8 months ago

    meanwhile updates on linux telling me exactly what is happening in real time, working completely in the background, and politely informing me that i may wish to reboot to apply all the updates properly

    • Boozilla@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Windows: Imma let you finish but first we gotta update my man. Will only take an hour. Maybe three.

      Linux: Save the drama for your mamma.

      • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Linux updates are much superior, but Windows updates have not taken more than 5 minutes for me for a long time.

        I just hate all the reboots. Linux can update everything, even kernels now, and no downtime. Reminds me of crap home internet routers: “oh you changed the date&time? Then I gotta reboot”

        • Boozilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The routine Windows updates do go pretty quickly, but the “cumulative updates” can still take a very long time in my experience. I have to patch multiple servers and workstations at my job and it sucks. And if you have a hyper-v guest that lies dormant most of the time, but you need to update it once or twice a month, may the gods help you. Takes forever to even CHECK for updates, because Windows freaks the hell out if your PC remains turned off for a period of time.