• Tak@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          By DNA analysis that was completely on the table till they went extinct.

          • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            No “till”, plenty of living beings have vestigial elements that were positive at some point of their history, yet no longer are, but are still maintained because there isn’t evolutionary pressure to get rid of them.

            • Tak@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              “They” was towards neanderthals not vestigial elements. They are extinct.

              • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Homo Sapiens develop a mutation XYZ that makes them not be attracted towards Neanderthals -> Neanderthals go extinct -> XYZ is NOW vestigial.

                • Tak@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  The genes were from Neanderthals not to make them unattractive and they’re also not vestigial. One is a very common gene related to blood clotting and can cause a higher risk of heart disease.

                  In other words, humans were fucking Neanderthals and we know it because of DNA. If they had never gone extinct it is without question the boinking would have continued.

    • Hotzilla@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      6 months ago

      Same as boobs, Human female breasts are mainly sexual, they are too large for babies to feed.

      • Holyginz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I refuse to believe that someone is dumb enough to actually believe this.

      • Rob T Firefly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 months ago

        they are too large for babies to feed.

        Then it seems I must have seen some of them fake it really convincingly for some reason.

      • Snowclone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’m sorry, but this isn’t correct, adult human females have breasts to hide when they are in estrus, by always being swollen, it’s called hidden estrose, it’s a whole thing. This has a lot of data backing it up. I KNOW I’M SPELLING IT WRONG! PROOFREADING IS THE LAST RETREAT OF COWARDS!!!