• Funkytom467@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Thinking people in their late teenage years and young adults aren’t mature enough to do some of those things is just a big tell of how bad we educate them rather than their brain not being “developed”.

    Consent is the most obvious example, teenagers are gonna have a sexual life no matter what you want them to do. Removing consent just remove yourself from the responsibility of educating them and entice them to stay hidden.

    Driving is also just necessary to anyone working, again being safe just need to be taught, plenty of adults are just as immature and stupid.

    The same can be said for drinking or smoking, prevention is so much more effective than restrictions.

    However, for voting or joining the army that’s when i agree. Because the system is built to prey on them, making sure they stay uneducated and vulnerable. So only then does having restrictions make sens to keep them safe.

    • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I don’t follow your argument about sex ed and consent.

      Sex ed should start as soon as kids can talk, to keep it from being stigmatized and to prevent predation. There is no need to wait until a child reaches sexual maturity for that; in fact, at that point it is too late.

      As to driving, most people shouldn’t be driving, period. We are, in general, not good at it. Leave it to the professionals.

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          Don’t know what’s so funny about that. Teaching your toddler that not everyone can touch their genitals is sex ed, and should absolutely be done as soon as they can understand it…

          • Xer0@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            6 months ago

            Ok, in that case I totally agree. But going into detail about actual sex doesn’t seem like a great idea that early.

            • hydrospanner@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 months ago

              There’s more than one specific topic covered in sex ed.

              We teach math to children, but nobody is suggesting that you need to get your toddler into differential equations.

              • Xer0@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                6 months ago

                Of course I don’t think that, it’s one of the most natural fucking things in the world. I just think for young children, especially ones who just learned how to talk, there’s things they definitely DON’T need to know yet.

      • Funkytom467@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        I agree, the sooner the better.

        Sex ed is what makes children mature enough to have sex once they reach the age of doing it.

        But what’s the point of raising the age of consent?

        My point is there isn’t any if sex ed is done well, it only makes sex more taboo.

        Conversely, if you want to raise it, maybe it’s because sex ed wasn’t done properly, making teens not able to be mature enough for an activity they are gonna do anyway.

        For driving, I would agree in general we aren’t good at driving, but changing our means of transport isn’t easy, despite being the best solution. That wasn’t really the topic though…