• Plastic_Ramses@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The democrats are following the law set up by the republicans underneath gwb.

    Unless you want biden to act like a dictator, there isnt much he can do considering the state of the senate/house.

    • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes - the Republicans instituted the bad thing, the Democrats perpetuated it. Obama had the White House , House , and Senate and didn’t close Gitmo as promised.

      I’m in favour of Biden acting like a dictator if it’s to do things like restore the rule of law, stop torture, and right wrongs like separating kids from their families for their entire childhood. The kinds of consequences that make dictatorships bad. What’s the value of proceduralism if it not just fails to correct, but actively delivers those outcomes?

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yep - there’s no shortage of examples - this is why I point to it as the unfortunate norm.

      • PugJesus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        Obama had the White House , House , and Senate and didn’t close Gitmo as promised.

        Did you follow the situation? Gitmo wasn’t closed because there was nowhere to transfer the prisoners. It was attempted, numerous times. There were legal battles over this.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          The irony.

          Would you mind giving a quick explanation of your understanding the rule of law and its relevance to the constitution and US legal system?

          Bonus points for extending this explanation to the 5th-8th amendment (particularly 6 and 8).

          • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Based on the downvotes, it seems we’re indifferent about the principles underpinning the constitution and the entire legal system, the right to a speedy trial and freedom from cruel and unusual punishment.

            Most of this wasn’t tested in those legal cases - to my knowledge, they didn’t even meaningfully challenge the fact that these detainees were being held by the US on foreign soil to transparently and dishonestly skirt those protections.

      • flying_gel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Not to defend them too much and I have to admit that I don’t know much about the details which bills were priorities during the 4 months that Obama has house, senate and Presidency.

        What I did read a while back was that Obama didn’t know how long his supermajority would last and some of the things he wanted he wanted done but couldn’t once he lost the house.

        • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’d say the shining city on the hill should have made restoring the rule of law a higher priority, but that’s just my opinion.

          It seems the GOP can make things plenty worse in a hell of a hurry, but when it comes to righting the wrongs, it’s all too hard. The Democrat inclination toward civility politics and the status quo over basics like protecting the rule of law and the democracy will be the death of us.

          • aesthelete@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It seems the GOP can make things plenty worse in a hell of a hurry, but when it comes to righting the wrongs, it’s all too hard.

            Funny thing that. It’s almost like being destructive is a lot easier than being constructive.

            That’s weird because it’s certainly a lot easier and quicker to build an entire city than it is to raze one…oh wait, no, the opposite of what I just said there is obviously true.

            • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              You mean like destroying the GOP’s atrocious policies, right? No? Then you might need to explain yourself, friend.

              • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                Yeah, that’s it. Improvement is really just destroying destruction!

                Wow, you really got me there. 😆

                After the village has been burnt down, it’s easy to fix because you just burn the ruins!

                • WaxedWookie@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You’re using the vaguest possible language and imagining you’re profound, then dismissing the example I gave because it disagrees with your narrative by point to burning villages as though that means anything?

                  I gave the more specific example of destroying Republican legislation, and either you’re too dishonest to acknowledge that, or too stupid to understand. Why be like this?

                  I’ll be more specific and point to 4 executive orders from Trump that Biden destroyed, and ask you to explain precisely what the fuck you think you’re talking about?

                  • Preventing Online Censorship

                  • Protecting American Monuments, Memorials, and Statues and Combating Recent Criminal Violence

                  • Building and Rebuilding Monuments to American Heroes

                  • Rebranding United States Foreign Assistance to Advance American Influence’

                  Try to refrain from smugly gesturing at vagueries - you look silly enough as is.

                  • aesthelete@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I gave the more specific example of destroying Republican legislation, and either you’re too dishonest to acknowledge that, or too stupid to understand. Why be like this?

                    Yes I’m too stupid. “Why be like this?” indeed.

                    How about instead of a weirdo list of things you’ve randomly assembled, we take the actual subject of this original post into consideration?

                    The reason they haven’t re-united the families is largely that there were no records and/or shitty records kept about who was separated from whom, so they don’t know who the children’s parents are.

                    Yet another example of how it’s easier to make a situation worse than it is to improve it. It’s much easier to separate families and bus the people in them around the country, and it’s harder to figure out whose 4-year-old some kid is.