It’s been a long ol time since I’ve known any lesbians well enough to ask such things, but I followed my brain down a weird line of inquiry, and got to wondering about the current state of the art for the gay gals. I guess I had always assumed it was similar to the dynamics of a gay guy relationship, but then I realized that since men have both an input and an output, they can choose, but it’s mechanically a bit different for cis women. Is there any relationship between that, and the slightly more masculine versus feminine flavors? Asking for a friend, who is me. I want to know. Thanks.

  • 5714@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You might want to differentiate between Top, Bottom, Switch and Top, Bottom, Versatile, i.e. BDSM vs penetration positions.

    I’d also say that this is less about physiology and more about the individual acceptance of the concept of position.

    Top, Bottom, Versatile is not necessarily a queer thing, since (cis&trans) heterosex can have positions as well. That is to say, not all queer relationships regardless of gender follow the concept of position.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s not just a position thing. It’s just that everyone exists either left or right of the center on the spectrum of ‘mostly giver vs mostly receiver/passive’ spectrum. The gay male community has taken to the terms of Top and Bottom to articulate ones usual preferences, and I was just curious if lesbians had come up with a similar canvas, or if it just doesn’t come up as much with them as it does for guys.

  • Chloë (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Me and my gal do have a top/bottom dynamic but it’s not very strong, like it’s just flirting and foreplay.

    There is no top or bottom when we do anything physically sexual, we just do it together and that’s great :)

  • Alk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve seen people (lesbians) talk about it, so I’m leaning toward yes, but I cannot give an authoritative answer as I am not a lesbian.

  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think there’s any group that doesn’t have some members who like domination. But I’m just speculating and am not an expert.

  • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    A lesbian couple on Twitch got asked who the top and who the bottom was. They said they switched.

    No idea what that means mechanically.

  • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I think in the second half you’re asking whether butches are more likely to be toppy and femmes are more likely to be bottomy.

    I think there’s probably some positive correlation there but butchness and toppiness are distinct concepts.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Things about this post:

      1. It’s concise, and address the initial post
      2. I’ve never heard the terms ‘toppy’ or ‘femme’ used in this way, but I’m happy that I have now.
      3. Is ‘Butch’ PC these days? I’m old and can’t keep track.
      4. It has the feeling of being written by a professional Lesbian scientist on their lunch break at work.
      5. I love it.
  • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you do a little googling it is easy to confirm but there is the sexual definition like you where referring to and then there is just the more general relationship definition which is basically the Top is the more dominate / assertive partner and the bottom is the more passive partner.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you “do a little googling” you can confirm anything you want wether it’s true or not. That’s why I came here to ask actual lesbian, and lesbian adjacent people.

      • AlternateRoute@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        So you asked a completely unverifiable public forum, full of users with ambiguous alts and user names and expect a BETTER answer?

        You must be new to the internet.

        • Pandantic [they/them]@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          No, they just believe in the honesty of people. Well, that and they probably also figured that having an aggregate of answers and the upvote/downvote system, they can ferret out a response.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Wow. You sound like the kind of person who picks a fight with a stranger on the internet, declare yourself the winner, goes through their profile to down vote their last hundred posts, and goes to bed at 6am, knowing that you’re the best.

          To address what was only a question in the technical sense, I ask this here, because I like being able to respond to people’s stories, and ask follow-up questions, which I can’t do reading a three year old article on an ad supported medium which was probably written to give to Grandma to explain why her favorite granddaughter never brings any boys over for Thanksgiving.

          Now quit being a jerk.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Kinda? It kinda permeated in through gay men, trans lesbians, and the kink community and developed a meaning of active partner with a dominant implication. So for example if I go down on my girlfriend before she returns the favor, it probably wouldn’t be called topping. But if I’m three fingers into a pillow princess as she calls me “Miss” you bet your ass that was topping. So it’s definitely more vibes based as versatility is assumed unless otherwise specified (and not being versatile is kinda rare)

    It also can refer to who’s wearing the strap at the moment.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Cool. God I love the nomenclature so much. I think I’m just jealous, because we don’t really have any fun terminology over here in Straight Vanilla Land. Explain Pillow Princess immediately.

      Also, while I have you: can you put into words the appeal of a strap-on in a lesbian relationship/encounter? I’m all for it, but It just seems like more work to achieve what you could using your hands, and neither party is usually into dicks anyway. Is it a Dom thing? Better cardio workout?

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah it comes from not having a default script to follow. A pillow princess is a woman, usually femme, who exclusively fills the receptive role in sex with women.

        As the old saying goes: it’s not penises we aren’t attracted to but the dicks they tend to be attached to. Less hostly said though, it’s that the sensation feels good, and it’s completely unrelated to men. In fact I usually forget that straight people don’t tend to see them as unrelated to men as we often do.

        • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The concept of the dildo makes perfect sense. I even buy the premise that a cock shaped fake cock would feel good given the original design specs of Mk.1 Human Vagangus. It’s just that thrusting from the hips is hard work, and while it’s a fantastic butt and ab workout, if i could get the same pleasure from a hand mounted penis, I would be constantly dehydrated. Is it more of an emotional or connection thing than a pragmatic choice?

  • growsomethinggood ()@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Hi! Not strictly a lesbian here but in a lesbian relationship. Yes, lesbians have top/bottom dynamics typically in the “one doing the action” vs the “one being acted upon” across various different acts. Most switch it up (“vers”), rather than identifying primarily as tops or bottoms. If you are strictly a top or strictly a bottom, you’re described as “stone” as in “stone top” or “stone bottom”.

    Very important that these are completely different roles than dominant/submissive/switch, which are BDSM terms and describe a more psychological aspect of a relationship than the more physical top/bottom/vers.

  • Vibi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    You’ll find that in queer culture, there’s not just top/bottom but a wide spectrum to define or describe preferences; I’m sure this all also applies to the BDSM world as well. There’s a variety of tops and bottoms and preferences like Bambi lesbians who don’t want sexual dynamics beyond cuddling and kissing.

    • stoicmaverick@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ya, but why is everyone jumping to BDSM? That’s not what I asked. I’ve never heard the term before, but I feel like “Bambi lesbian” is kinda reinventing the wheel for the sake of a cute name. Isn’t that just a romantic asexual with a gay modifier?

      • Repple (she/her)@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Bambi is an old term, older than me. It predates descriptions like homoromantic asexual, so not reinventing the wheel at all

      • psycotica0@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I think the reason people are jumping to BDSM community terms is because BDSM people fucking love terms. They’ve got taxonomy for days, and they live to whip it out, so to speak.

      • juliebean@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        it kind of is, as far as i can tell, or at least it’s adjacent, though the term actually predates modern asexual nomenclature, and the split-attraction model, which didn’t really take off until the internet did. ‘bambi lesbian’ has merely had a resurgence in recent years because it sounds cute as hell.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    C’mon OP, every sort of human sexual interaction has dynamics like this. Top or bottom, submissive or dominant, switching it up, all that, we humans do it.

  • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    In addition to the cis lesbian explanations below, don’t forget about our trans lesbian friends.

  • davel@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I suppose this question better than the previous generation’s “So which one of you is the man?”