Dammit Sony, you just had to improve upon it and then you went and fucked it up with the Vita :/

    • Krauerking@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      14 days ago

      No no… They have a point.

      I love my PSP. Best console ever. But the vita could do all of it and more.

      • dual touchscreens
      • OLED screen
      • no disk drive
      • AR camera setup
      • cell data and fast wifi

      It just also was so powerful that game developers didn’t want to put the effort in but not powerful enough to straight port games to.
      It had solid state storage that was proprietary though that was overpriced and impossible to find.

      So no games to support it. No sales to bring down production costs…
      It floundered hard. But as my emulator handheld with mods to let it take SD cards it’s easier to pull out than almost anything else and a catalog of PlayStation games and more… It was an upgrade just Sony failed it.

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        It was a gimmicky touch pad, the no drive is a negative, without that there was 0 backwards compatibility with the PSPs large library. Which I peg as the main reason it floundered so hard

        OLED, 3G and better wifi could have easily been added to a 4th gen PSP iteration

        • Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          14 days ago

          They could play PSP games big issue was buying them again and not being able to download them on the unaffordable memory.

          If it had games constantly coming out like the switch did when it first launched it would have been very similar. And if it had storage that was affordable doubly so.

          Instead it had the pricing of full consoles for games and few of them from the development costs. Sony failed to bring the games Nintendo does and that killed it far worse than a lack of a spinning disk drive that skipped if you shook it hard enough.

          • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            I mean yea that’s kinda my point, Sony had to have known they were not in fact Nintendo and were definitely not going to keep up with the amount of games Nintendo published. Keeping the drive would have been a cheap way to get a running start on the library.

            They got greedy and thought people would be happy to re buy PSP games AND fork over money for their insanely priced memory sticks

            • Krauerking@lemy.lol
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              14 days ago

              They actually also made the go and a literal gaming cellphone at this time. I think they were trying to move away from the disks (they were up against the DS) and tried lots of things but put all the money in the hardware instead of the games.
              Cause they are like Nintendo when you look at their main consoles.

              It’s a great piece of hardware. Truly impressive and worth being praised for it but it failed super hard. And it’s not they didn’t keep up they just didn’t use enough of the budget to pay developers to develop the games, and thought people would just be excited about the hardware like they were.

              • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                14 days ago

                The xperia play was not made by PlayStation and in fact PlayStation did not like the idea that they were using the PlayStation brand. That was all on big boy Sony and Sony Ericsson.

    • whome@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 days ago

      How? UMD was shit, vitas display was a huge upgrade. The analogue sticks were better… I gifted my son the Vita last year and it still holds up. Couldn’t do that with my PSP cause it’s broken.

      • cm0002@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 days ago

        The UMD, was decent enough, it was optical after all. The problem was they took it away for a gimmicky rear touchpad and in turn locked out all backwards compatibility with PSP games. Which in turn, led to its ultimate downfall because it didn’t have the big backfill of a library when it REALLY needed it to head off the rising smartphone competition (Vita released in 2012)

        Display and sticks were better yea, but nothing groundbreaking that couldn’t have been included on a 4th gen PSP iteration.

        Also the UI was shit, they replaced the nice XMR/CBR (Whatever it was called) with those stupid bubbles.

        • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          14 days ago

          A umd drive in a vita would’ve been ridiculous.

          Any digital purchases made on the psp store were honoured on the vita and you didn’t face to but them again.

          Even so, nowadays it’s just straight up the better option with adrenaline being able to play every PSP game natively, not emulated. The vitas resolution is also a straight 2x scale so the scaling is perfect and allows for an LCD grid shader if you want it to look even more like a PSP.

          I tried playing my PSP again a few days ago but that display has deteriorated soooo much. The constant motion blur like qualities is insane. It was already bad when new but it’s almost unplayable now and you’d be hard pressed to find a PSP anywhere near what it looked like on release now I imagine.