• Skua@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    One thing that might help it feel less strange is realising that you already use a grammatically plural pronoun to refer to individuals all the time: the word “you”. It’s always “you are tall”, not “you is tall”, same as “we” or “they” instead of “he” or “she”. This is because it was historically plural, and “thou” was the singular. Over time we started using the plural to be more polite, and then eventually always using it.

    • Makeshift@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I’m joining in the “this blew my mind” sentiment and just want to say thanks for sharing this tidbit of info.

    • JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      “Thou is tall” sounds weird though.

      you already use a grammatically plural pronoun to refer to individuals all the time: the word “you”. It’s always “you are tall”,

      This made my brain short circuit lol. Can’t believe I never noticed.

        • njaard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          No, that’s incorrect.

          It’s “Thou are tall” or “Thou art tall

          Nominative   Oblique  Possessive 
          Thou         Thee     Thy/Thine* 
          I            Me       My/Mine*
          He           Him      His
          She          Her      Her/Hers**
          You          You      Your/Yours**
          

          * Used as an object (It is thine) or historically, when the following word started in the vowel (Thine eyes sparkle like diamonds, Mine ears ache)

          ** Used as an object (it is hers)

      • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        That’s because “is” is the third person conjugation of Be, not the second. Of course it sounds weird.

        “Thou are”, and the actually correct “thou art” both feel much more natural.

          • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            The conjugation of Be, “is” is not used in the second person (you, be it singular or plural) any more than “am” is (“am” is first person singular form.) regardless of the plurality (or lack thereof) in the subject.

            The correct Be conjugations for second person subjects are “art” (2nd, singular, archaic) and “are”.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 days ago

              So is thou/you plural or singular? I’m very confused. I’m not a grammar person lol. This conversation began because someone said thou is singular.

              • Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Do you remember your conjugation tables from Spanish or French class?

                English has them too, but the modern ones are much smaller than most (all?) other European languages.

                • JackbyDev@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  I think because it’s so small for English and because I’m a native speaker it’s all just second nature and I don’t really know the technicalities. Conjugating verbs in Spanish is one of my most frustrating areas of learning lol.

    • samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It only feels strange because of how it’s been used previously in my lifetime, not from historical usage. But as you’ve shown, language changes over time, and not having a singular neutral pronoun has proven to be a big omission in English (since “they” has only traditionally been used that way in certain limited cases). If it was good enough for “you,” it’s good enough for “they!”