I ask because I feel I need to save some money in the oncoming months. Currently, I pay over $76 for 100MBps/1000GB cap. And I don’t think it’s a bad deal, but they’re going to be hiking it up to $90+ by next October and I feel it is not worth that. But I also need to save money too.

What is the difference between 55MB and 100MB when it comes to speed? The cap for the 55MBps plan is 350GB and I tried asking if that could be altered but the ISP says they can’t. This plan will cost me $30 a month.

All I ever do anymore is just stream YouTube, sometimes Hulu/Netflix/Tubi. Occasionally I’ll download a game or two, multiplayer gaming is non-existent.

Edit: There’s been a lot of good responses replied to this and I appreciate it.

I’m leaning towards on downgrading with the volume of people that suggest that it isn’t that bad, but it boils down to preferences and habitual behaviors when using the internet. With so many games already downloaded and being left to just streaming/Second Life, I think it warrants the change.

I just wish that my ISP would’ve kicked up the cap to 500GB because that’d sweeten the deal much more but this ISP is not well known and these kind of ISPs operate on different worlds than the big names.

Furthermore, people have suggested going 5G Wireless but the problem with that is that my apartment management is stingy as fuck so it’s not an option for me nor does Verizon say that they can offer a plan in my current location. Fiber connections such as Google Fiber, MetroNet .etc aren’t an option.

Century Link seems to only offer $70 for…10MB in my location (Fucking awful)

Mediacom says they can’t even service my area (then how come I see your vans around where I am with other customers?)

  • Jeena@piefed.jeena.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Speed should be the same (as in ping), the bandwidth is half of it. If you are alone 50Mb/s should be more than enought for people who don’t need to download huge amounts of data quickly.

    So if you don’t build operating systems from source code, don’t need to download huge games on a regular basis, don’t work as a editor with huge video files you share with others, don’t do p2p pirating, and similar things, I don’t think you will see a big difference.

    If you’re a big family where everyone starts streaming youtube or twitch/netflix or do alot of voice/IP calls when they come home at the same time, then you will feel the difference.

  • Owl@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m betting $100 on you running back to your ISP’s nearest office to extend your plan within a week.

  • Pulptastic@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    Last summer I switched to Tmo 5G home internet. At my location it beats the 100/20 cable plan I had at half the price. YMMV, my last house only 1/4 mile away it was unusably slow, like 20/1

    • Psythik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      5G fixed wireless is the way. I could pay Cox $120/mo for a 500Mbps cable line with a data cap, or I could pay Verizon $60/mo for 5G and get 1200Mbps with no BS fake data cap.

      5G home internet is cheap because not a lot of people have it yet. Jump on the train now OP before it gets more expensive.

      The only catch is that you have to make sure you have good line-of-sight to the tower before you order. That’s the key to getting good speeds. Look out your windows and try to find some 5G antennas. In my neighborhood they’re installed on the light poles.

      That said, even if you can only get LTE service, chances are it’ll still be cheaper and faster than the competition in your area. So it still might be worth it to look into it.

  • Moonguide@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve been gaming and streaming most of my life with sub-30mbps download and sub 15 upload speeds, didn’t have symmetrical 50+ until a year ago.

    As others have said, you have to plan ahead. If you need to download something large, let it be and go do something else while it does its thing. Streaming high quality on two screens or more is doable but you’ll buffer eventually.

    You can probably set up some rules on your router to prioritise whatever device you deem most important, however. Although, if its important enough to warrant a rule on your router, it would probably be better to just plug an ethernet cable in anyway.

  • flashgnash@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I was on 50 max for a while, it’s perfectly fine for pretty much everything but big downloads will take longer

    (I was gaming online on voice chat at the same time my family was streaming and there wasn’t any issue)

    I have just upgraded to 500mb for about £35 a month though your pricing is rough

  • essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I thought I was overpaying for my 1500Mbps at £75

    Thank you EU for your many blessings.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      lol now comes australia: $109 for 100/40, and that’s a good deal because our conservative government fucked everything and pissed away $40bn

  • Knuschberkeks@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I went from 100 Mb/s to 50 Mb/s about 1.5 years ago, and to be honest it is enough but can be an annoyance. Streaming is no Problem, even two concurrent 4k streams work (tried on youtube, Netflix and Disney+). Downloads just take a while so if you have to download larger files you need to plan ahead a bit. Also, streaming while performing large downloads is tricky. In order to avoid constant buffering you’ll need to either significantly reduce your streams quality or set um some priorisation rules on your network.

  • toastal@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    I pay $15 / mo for 600 Mbps symetric in Thailand. But I go off the beaten path with just my cell as a hotspot which is 10 Mbps for $90 annually. I can do almost anything I want with even those speeds—just make sure you are blocking ads (uBlock + DNS) to stop all the sludge from gauming up your pipes.

  • SparrowHawk@feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    To me in Italy, which generally has shitty internet by europe standards, your rates are horrifingly terrible, expensive, and inexplicably capped. I pity your network

    • TheRealKuni@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      To me in Michigan, I also find those rates horrifyingly terrible, expensive, and inexpensively capped.

      But here we have a few options for ISPs. In places where they don’t really compete with each other, you can get absurdly terrible plans. And it’s perfectly legal because fuck you, consumer, that’s why.

  • etchinghillside@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    I regularly self throttle to 5 Mbs – you’ll survive.

    If anything there might be a slim chance that you’ll hit your data cap of 350gb.

    Assuming you’re just doing 480/720p streaming you should be good. But if you download 2-3 recentish games that might kick you over.

    You might try turning on data gathering on your router if it offers it to see how much you are using.

  • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wow that is expensive.

    In NZ I’m on a 300/100 plan with no data cap, for $77/month. That is about $43USD/month.

    • fuzzyspudkiss@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It definitely is, middle of nowhere Indiana here - I’m getting 1000/1000 for $95 and no cap. But I’m lucky enough to be in a location with competition, lots of areas in the US only have one option so they get charged whatever the ISP wants.

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        95 fucking dollars a month?!? And you reckon that’s a good deal?

        I’d call it Stockholm syndrome but even the Swedish know you’re getting fucked up the ass 😂

  • satanmat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It depends… you say several times “I”. So yeah if it is just you, 55 is likely fine.

    If you are the only one, watching something, then yeah likely you’ll be fine

  • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    A single 1080p Netflix stream will consume about 4Mbps.

    If you just stream music and media and browse the net, that’s an easy way to benchmark. If you’re gaming, higher speeds will not increase performance of online gaming - this requires quite little and depends more on latency (satellite/star link vs cable/fiber etc). The higher speeds will only help with more concurrent users or game/media downloads (if you pirate media, for example).