• Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    42
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just go look at my posting history, go back about ten months or so, and you’ll get a full understanding what it’s all about. Focus on the comments that discuss Safe Harbor laws.

    If you’re just going to mock me about it, to try and dissuade me from using it in the future, don’t bother, it hasn’t worked in the past, and it won’t work now.

    This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

    • orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      A) I don’t care about your posting history or any other person’s. It’s not important.

      B) I wasn’t planning to mock you, but you’re definitely being a little defensive.

      C) Since you’re being so defensive, you actually think that it holds any water or would stand up to legal scrutiny given that you’re posting on a publicly accessible forum?

      This feels like the online equivalent to wearing an N95 face mask while on a hike away from civilization: pointless.

      • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        39
        ·
        edit-2
        8 days ago

        A) I don’t care about your posting history or any other person’s. It’s not important.

        Well the answers to your questions are in that posting history, so it is important, if you’re being intellectually honest about the questions that you’re asking, and not just astroturfing.

        I’m trying to NOT repeat myself now, and derail and sidetrack the conversation currently being had.

        B) I wasn’t planning to mock you, but you’re definitely being a little defensive.

        No, I’m not being defensive, at least not in the way you think I am. It’s just a matter of the repetitiveness, defending from the constant attacks about using it being very tiring, as well as derailing the actual conversations currently being had, and I’d rather avoid them.

        C) Since you’re being so defensive, you actually think that it holds any water or would stand up to legal scrutiny given that you’re posting on a publicly accessible forum?

        I stand by what I said, and I believe the laws on my side on this matter, especially when it comes in Safe Harbor laws, and how laws are greater than user agreements.

        This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

        • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 days ago

          Put a link in your license that goes to one of your comments that explains the whole license thing. Then you never have to have this conversation again.

          Ain’t no one going to trawl through 10 months of your comments to find it.

          • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Put a link in your license that goes to one of your comments that explains the whole license thing. Then you never have to have this conversation again.

            I’m trying to not talk about it, and would like others to not talk about it either, but instead talk about other things, like the subject of the post my comment(s) are made in. So if they want answers to their questions, they’re going to have to read my previous comments, as I don’t want to repeat myself.

            Ain’t no one going to trawl through 10 months of your comments to find it.

            You wouldn’t have to read through all tenish months worth. Just go back that far and read one of the first comments/conversations that you see. There was one that was over something like seventy(?) comments in it, going into great detail, both pro and con, of how people (including myself) felt on the top.

            This comment is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

            • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 days ago

              But they are talking about it because you don’t have a link that explains it and avoids the conversation.

              You know, someone’s going to read this comment three months from now, and then the instructions to go back ten months from now aren’t going to be appropriate anymore.

              Just add a link for crying out loud!

                  • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    6 days ago

                    https://lemmy.world/post/14942506

                    That’s just one example. I particpated in that conversation.

                    If you just looked through a few of my comments from tenish months ago, you’d see allot more of that kind of ‘discussion’ directed at me.

                    Otherwise, the only link needed is the one I have in my comments, that points to the license that I’m using on my content.

        • baines@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 days ago

          you already got one link, you might as well add another one explaining it all so I can not click it as well