• hansolo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Paper; Notebooks. Key only physical door locks. Manual transmission cars. Not having any IoT appliances, and not connecting everything you own to WiFi. Hard drive full of MP3s. Cash. Not being available for a call if you’re not at home.

    Source: work tangential enough to cybersecurity.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Hard drive full of MP3s is love, hard drive full of MP3s is life.

      Although ATM my folder is just 1.1GB including the music videos, so I could probably store it on a thumb drive or carefully-chosen dishwasher; it doesn’t have to be a hard drive.

      • Dem Bosain@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Marijuana is legal here. Dispensaries can ONLY accept cash, because they’re locked out of the federal banking system.

        • bassomitron@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I think some states are offering workarounds for that dilemma now, but I really do wish the US federal would just legalize it already. We have 24 states that have already legalized it, as well as 3 territories and D.C… Around 33 states have for medical purposes.

          When 2/3 of a country has legalized something in some form, it should become the de facto law of the land at the federal level. Those other states can continue keeping it illegal if their citizens so choose, but the Federal government should be forced to at least decriminalize it if it’s something that isn’t directly harming people against their will.

          • hansolo@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            Lol, might as well hang a sign out front that says “I share data with cops.”

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                I’m sure they have a group chat, right?

                “Guys, how much are you selling your yay for these days? I’ve had negative feedback from three people now about prices. I can handle these bad Yelp reviews.”

            • bassomitron@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Now hold on, maybe they’re onto something. The highest levels of drug dealers most likely aren’t accepting cash, they’re laundering their money through legitimate fronts. Small time dealers setting up some simple LLC or something for a relatively small fee and funneling money through that could actually shield you better from local law enforcement. I’m pretty sure Cashapp and their ilk offer business accounts nowadays, haven’t checked myself.

              • hansolo@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Block, the company that owns Cash App, lost a court case and had to pay an $80m fine for failing to adhere to anti-money laundering laws. The Feds have been all over it for a year. Maybe 3 years ago it was possible to fake the KYC, but not a much so anymore.

                The only truly non-tracable financial system is Monero, and many exchanges won’t touch it because it has such a close connection to crime.

  • janbaumy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fax machines and overhead projectors, if you live in Germany. Basically every office here still has a (frequently used) Fax machine and all schools still use overhead projectors.

    It was actually quite a shock to me when my University retired their projectors in 2023. They sent an email to each and every student as a warning. Life‘s crazy here.

    • PraiseTheSoup@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      As a stupid american that took a few German classes in highschool many years ago, I must know, do you call it “der Projektor” or “der Bildwerfer”?

      • janbaumy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        100% „der Projektor“. Bildwerfer makes sense as well, but I have never heard anyone use that word before.

        It actually reminds me of the German version of me_irl (ich_iel) where they try to use German words exclusively even if it sounds completely silly.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Printing out tickets as a backup. I do this for concerts and travel because then I don’t have to worry about batteries dying, wifi/roaming not being available, getting logged out and having trouble getting back to the ticket, etc.

    I also print out maps when doing wilderness backpacks because even if you download the map you’ll burn through your battery life well before the hike is over but a paper map is just as good. If I really need to confirm my location I can occasionally turn on the app and shut it off. I keep the maps in a gallon ziplock so water isn’t an issue.

    • NGram@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ticketmaster is doing their very best to make paper tickets unusable with refreshing barcodes. Funny thing is that “anti-theft” feature is needed because of their own systemic failures. I do like tickets that are just sent to my email or similar (e.g. as an attachment that I can save to my phone) though, it’s better than wasting paper when I know my phone won’t fail me.

  • hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fax machines. Phone lines are pretty private, and sending a fax is usually more secure than emailing something, especially if someone else manages your email.

    • Willard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Counterpoint, fax is not encrypted and wire taps are very easy. At least e-mail can be encrypted so Joe shmoe on the street can’t see it.

      Besides, all faxing these days is going through VOIP and computers anyways.

      • hperrin@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Having to physically wire tap the phone line is a lot more difficult and requires local bad actors. Email’s exposure to the internet makes it easier to hack. Yes, email can be encrypted, but if your server is compromised, that doesn’t matter. End to end encryption for email is much harder, and isn’t really used by any institutions (and usually can’t be because of data retention regulations), so the server has complete access to the unencrypted email in almost all cases. Compromising a fax machine that isn’t connected to the internet is a lot harder.

        Not all faxes go through VoIP. Your everyday home fax machine probably uses VoIP, because having a landline installed in your home is stupid expensive and unnecessary, but faxes in institutions probably use the PSTN. These institutions most likely need landlines anyway, so having a dedicated fax line makes a lot more sense.

        And if a fax goes through VoIP, it’ll be encrypted the same way email is. So in that case, it’s the same level of security as email, which is to say, easier to compromise. At least you can’t trick someone into clicking a link in a fax though.

        • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          you can choose whatever email provider you trust, and then they apply encryption on the transport level. but there is often very few phone companies, and zero encryption. they don’t have to install any kind of wiretaps, they can just record everything automatically that passes through

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Proton mail is encrypted on the server with your key and proton does not have access to it. If you lose your login credentials and have to reset then you lose your old email because that key is not getting recovered.

          • hperrin@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            The email comes into their server unencrypted. They promise that they will encrypt it for you, though. Of course, you’re also relying on the sending server to keep the message secure as well.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              Proton Mail’s end-to-end encryption and zero-access encryption ensure only you can see your emails. Not even Proton can view the content of your emails and attachments.

              • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                The vast majority of senders do not send email using end to end encryption. If you’re sending an email from a PM address to another PM address, sure, it’s end to end encrypted. If you’re sending to another service, it’s not end to end encrypted unless you’ve both gone through the painful steps of setting up PGP encryption. Same as if you’re receiving from another service.

                You can read about it here:

                https://proton.me/support/proton-mail-encryption-explained

                So that quote you just responded with is saying exactly what I had just said above it. They promise that they’ll encrypt that unencrypted email that just came into their server for you. And they promise that they’ll encrypt that unencrypted email you just sent outside their service.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  I know, but I was answering the question about encryption, rather than users. Proton also allows sending encrypted to non participating receivers. They get a weblink and have to open it to view the email a with password if supplied. That decrypts the email at the browser, and has an expiry time on the link.

  • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    CDs/DVDs/BluRays

    I don’t want to support Spotify, which is owned by tencent. I don’t want to spend a fortune on streaming services. I don’t want to sell my data to google by using YouTube, and I want to be able to listen to music/ watch movies when offline.

    • piyuv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Spotify is not owned by Tencent. It’s publicly traded, and tencent owns part of it.

      There are a lot of reasons to hate Spotify (and Daniel Ek) but this is not one of it.

      The short version: Tencent Holdings is about to own 10 percent of Universal, which in turns owns around 3.5 percent in Spotify, which in turn owns around nine percent in Tencent Music Entertainment, which in turn is part-owned by Universal’s two main rivals (Warner and Sony), but remains majority owned by Tencent Holdings, which in turn owns 9.1 percent of Spotify. (And, yes, no kidding, that’s the short version.)

      https://www.rollingstone.com/pro/news/who-really-owns-spotify-955388/

      • KokusnussRitter@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        For me personally? I have been steadily changing the way I source media over the past 2-3 years. Also I lately read more of other ppl going back to physical media for the same-ish reasons.

  • cRazi_man@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Your caveman brain. People think they’re educated an enlightened and everything they do now is so well thought out. Nope, the caveman is in the driving seat for all of us. Even your most high level meetings and interviews are influenced by how hungry, horny, or hurt you are by a teasing comment yesterday. Everyone is looking to establish dominance at any cost, when you don’t really need to.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Everyone is looking to establish dominance at any cost, when you don’t really need to.

      You know, I see the rest, but I don’t see this. A lot of people are straight-up doormats.

  • Ziggurat@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Obligatory thought to cobol, which is stil the backbone of banking computers.

    I would also think to the good old electromechanical relay which are still pretty common

    More political, but whatever what imperator Musk thinks Privacy isn’t obsolete

    • Pherenike@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not only is it not obsolete, it’s easier now than eight years ago when I started degoogling, there are so many decent alternatives nowadays to all kinds of services and apps.