• resetbypeer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    Not to mention the sheer amount of security vulnerabilities they constantly have in their products. I never recommend QNAP for that reason. Out of the box solutions I only recommend Synology. Selfbuild route is uraid and my personal fav. Truenas scale.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Get an x86 Qnap and put Truenas Scale on it - there is no case in that form factor in existence.

    • nexusband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Get an x86 Qnap and put Truenas Scale on it - there is no case in that form factor in existence.

    • Molecular0079@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Man, I have GOT to try Truenas Scale one of these days. I see it recommended so often, but I was just too used to a standard Linux ecosystem to bother learning something new. I am assuming it gets you closer to the feel of a pre-built NAS during administration tasks compared to Cockpit and a SSH session lmao.

      I think I am just always afraid of being locked into a specific way of doing things by a vendor. I feel like I would get annoyed if something that I could do easily on standard Linux was harder to do on Truenas Scale.

      • resetbypeer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        For sure. It’s basically a NAS software appliance. You just need to bring your own x86 hardware. Truenas core was good, but they will stop actively developing soon in favor for scale.

        I have it running both hardware (backup) as well as virtualized (with a special sas/sata card as PCI pass thru). Works like a charm.