Trex202@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · 4 days agoYSK - a very comprehensive guide on how to avoid "very"lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkYSK - a very comprehensive guide on how to avoid "very"lemmy.worldTrex202@lemmy.world to You Should Know@lemmy.world · 4 days agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareshalafi@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-23 days agoThe percentage of people among the general population who know the difference is about 2.5356%. I’ll allow it. For the shooters out there, I’m all about accuracy. Sometimes precision for fun, but I just want in the general area for most cases.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 days ago 2.5356%. clever. (But is that accurate?) I don’t entirely agree with that image – the first one says low accuracy, low precision – but it’s the best accuracy possible given the low precision.
minus-squaresolarvector@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoGood point, should have the cluster size from #3, just offset.
minus-squarejsomae@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·3 days agoAs I recall, the mathematical definition of accuracy does have some overlap with precision, so increasing precision improves accuracy as well. It’s just a little confusing.
The percentage of people among the general population who know the difference is about 2.5356%. I’ll allow it.
For the shooters out there, I’m all about accuracy. Sometimes precision for fun, but I just want in the general area for most cases.
clever. (But is that accurate?)
I don’t entirely agree with that image – the first one says low accuracy, low precision – but it’s the best accuracy possible given the low precision.
Good point, should have the cluster size from #3, just offset.
As I recall, the mathematical definition of accuracy does have some overlap with precision, so increasing precision improves accuracy as well. It’s just a little confusing.