The ancient Romans thought a large penis was less desirable. You could mock someone for being big.
Well yes but no. Aesthetically, it was considered vulgar. So was drinking wine “raw”, but people still got plenty drunk all the time. And no matter the fashion of the statues of the time, sex still worked the same.
You couldn’t just say it’s body shaming ans stupid to push anyone with a small Penis to white nationalism?
Why did you have to frame it that insulting men’s bodies is actually just misogyny?
Questioning someone’s lived experience of misogyny is literally white nationalism. I diagnose you with micropenis.
The worst part is genuinely can’t tell if this is serious or not.
It’s the patriarchy that defined large dicks as more masculine and “good”. You think “small penis” is an insult because you were taught that it was.
Fun fact. The ancient Romans thought a large penis was less desirable. You could mock someone for being big.
Sure, I would agree with that, but just because it’s root cause is the patriarchy does not mean that something that hurts men is actually misogyny.
Yeah, I think misogyny was the wrong term. They’re not the same.
Well yes but no. Aesthetically, it was considered vulgar. So was drinking wine “raw”, but people still got plenty drunk all the time. And no matter the fashion of the statues of the time, sex still worked the same.
Exactly. The G spot is like 2" inside, and people still have fingers and tongues.